Birnbaum Marvin L, Daily Elaine K, O'Rourke Ann P, Loretti Alessandro
1Emeritus Professor of Medicine and Physiology,School of Medicine and Public Health,University of Wisconsin,Madison,Wisconsin USA;Emeritus Editor-in-Chief,Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.
2Nursing Section Editor,Prehospital and Disaster Medicine;Executive Secretary,World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine,Madison,WisconsinUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):523-38. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005130.
A Conceptual Framework upon which the study of disasters can be organized is essential for understanding the epidemiology of disasters, as well as the interventions/responses undertaken. Application of the structure provided by the Conceptual Framework should facilitate the development of the science of Disaster Health. This Framework is based on deconstructions of the commonly used Disaster Management Cycle. The Conceptual Framework incorporates the steps that occur as a hazard progresses to a disaster. It describes an event that results from the changes in the release of energy from a hazard that may cause Structural Damages that in turn, may result in Functional Damages (decreases in levels of function) that produce needs (goods and services required). These needs can be met by the goods and services that are available during normal, day-to-day operations of the community, or the resources that are contained within the community's Response Capacity (ie, an Emergency), or by goods and services provided from outside of the affected area (outside response capacities). Whenever the Local Response Capacity is unable to meet the needs, and the Response Capacities from areas outside of the affected community are required, a disaster occurs. All responses, whether in the Relief or Recovery phases of a disaster, are interventions that use the goods, services, and resources contained in the Response Capacity (local or outside). Responses may be directed at preventing/mitigating further deterioration in levels of functions (damage control, deaths, injuries, diseases, morbidity, and secondary events) in the affected population and filling the gaps in available services created by Structural Damages (compromise in available goods, services, and/or resources; ie, Relief Responses), or may be directed toward returning the affected community and its components to the pre-event functional state (ie, Recovery Responses). Hazard Mitigation includes interventions designed to decrease the likelihood that a hazard will cause an event, and should an event occur, that the amount of energy released will be reduced. Capacity Building consists of all interventions undertaken before an event occurs in order to increase the resilience of the community to an event related to a hazard that exists in an area-at-risk. Resilience is the combination of the Absorbing, Buffering, and Response Capacities of a community-at-risk, and is enhanced through Capacity-Building efforts. A disaster constitutes a failure of resilience.
一个能够组织灾害研究的概念框架对于理解灾害流行病学以及所采取的干预措施/应对行动至关重要。应用该概念框架所提供的结构应有助于灾害健康科学的发展。此框架基于对常用灾害管理周期的解构。该概念框架纳入了随着危害演变为灾害而发生的各个步骤。它描述了这样一个事件:危害所释放能量的变化导致可能造成结构破坏,进而可能导致功能损害(功能水平下降),从而产生需求(所需的商品和服务)。这些需求可以通过社区日常正常运作期间可用的商品和服务、社区应对能力(即紧急情况)中所包含的资源,或者受影响地区以外提供的商品和服务(外部应对能力)来满足。只要当地应对能力无法满足需求,且需要受灾社区以外地区的应对能力时,就会发生灾害。所有应对行动,无论是在灾害的救援阶段还是恢复阶段,都是利用应对能力(当地或外部)中所包含的商品、服务和资源的干预措施。应对行动可能旨在防止/减轻受影响人群功能水平的进一步恶化(损害控制、死亡、伤害、疾病、发病率和次生事件),填补结构破坏造成的可用服务缺口(可用商品、服务和/或资源的受损;即救援应对),或者可能旨在使受灾社区及其组成部分恢复到事件发生前的功能状态(即恢复应对)。危害缓解包括旨在降低危害引发事件的可能性以及在事件发生时减少能量释放量的干预措施。能力建设包括在事件发生前采取的所有干预措施,以提高社区对与存在风险地区的危害相关事件的复原力。复原力是处于风险中的社区的吸收、缓冲和应对能力的综合体现,并通过能力建设努力得到增强。灾害构成了复原力的失效。