锂盐维持治疗对情感障碍患者估计肾小球滤过率的长期影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Long-term effect of lithium maintenance therapy on estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with affective disorders: a population-based cohort study.
作者信息
Clos Stefan, Rauchhaus Petra, Severn Alison, Cochrane Lynda, Donnan Peter T
机构信息
Community LD Psychiatry, Murray Royal Hospital, Perth, UK.
Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
出版信息
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;2(12):1075-83. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00316-8. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
BACKGROUND
For more than 40 years, the long-term effect of lithium maintenance therapy on renal function has been debated. We aimed to assess the effect of lithium maintenance therapy on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eFGR) in patients with affective disorders, and explore predictors for a decrease in eGFR.
METHODS
This population-based cohort study included adult patients (18-65 years of age at baseline) in Tayside (Scotland, UK) who had recently started on lithium maintenance treatment between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2011 (retrospectively assigned to the lithium group) or those with exposure to other first-line drugs used in the treatment of affective disorders (quetiapine, olanzapine, and semisodium valproate) during the same period (retrospectively assigned to the comparator group). Patients had to have at least 6 months of (incidence) exposure to lithium or any of the comparator drugs, at least two eGFR values available in the observation period (one at baseline and at least one after ≥6 months post baseline). We excluded patients with previous exposure to lithium or one of the comparator drugs, those with a previous diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, those with glomerular disease, tubulo-interstitial disease, or chronic kidney disease stages 4-5 at baseline, and those who had undergone renal transplant before exposure. Maximum follow-up was 12 years. Data were provided by the University of Dundee Health Informatics Centre, who have access to health-related population-based datasets containing data for every patient registered with a regional family doctor. Each patient has a unique ten-digit identifier, the Community Health Index, enabling us to link laboratory tests, dispensed community prescriptions, Scottish Morbidity Records, and mortality records to the patient. All data were anonymised according to Health Informatics Centre standard operating procedures. The primary outcome was the change per year in the eGFR, adjusted for age, sex, and baseline eGFR, and analysed by random coefficient models.
FINDINGS
1120 patients (305 exposed to lithium and 815 to comparator drugs) qualified for inclusion, providing 13 963 eGFR values over 12 years. The mean duration of exposure to lithium was 55 months (SD 42; range 6-144). Mean annual decline in eGFR (adjusted for age, sex, and baseline eGFR) was 1·3 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) (SE 0·2) in the lithium group, which did not differ significantly to that in the comparator group (0·9 mL/min/1·73 m(2) [SE 0·15]). After adjustment for additional confounders, the monthly decline in eGFR attributable to lithium exposure amounted to 0·02 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) (SE 0·02, p=0·30). As a post-hoc secondary outcome, we estimated the annual decline in eGFR for the lithium group to be 1·0 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) (SE 0·2), which again did not differ significantly to that in the comparator group (0·4 mL/min/1·73 m(2) [SE 0·2]. Modelling identified significant predictors for eGFR decline as age, baseline eGFR, comorbidities, co-prescriptions of nephrotoxic drugs, and episodes of lithium toxicity; however, duration of exposure to lithium and mean serum lithium level were not significant predictors for eGFR decline.
INTERPRETATION
Our analysis suggests no effect of stable lithium maintenance therapy (lithium levels in therapeutic range) on the rate of change in eGFR over time. Our results therefore contradict the idea that long-term lithium therapy is associated with nephrotoxicity in the absence of episodes of acute intoxication and that duration of therapy and cumulative dose are the major determinants of toxicity.
FUNDING
None.
背景
四十多年来,锂盐维持治疗对肾功能的长期影响一直存在争议。我们旨在评估锂盐维持治疗对情感障碍患者估算肾小球滤过率(eFGR)的影响,并探索估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降的预测因素。
方法
这项基于人群的队列研究纳入了泰赛德地区(英国苏格兰)的成年患者(基线年龄18 - 65岁),这些患者在2000年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间开始接受锂盐维持治疗(回顾性分配至锂盐组),或同期接受情感障碍治疗中使用的其他一线药物(喹硫平、奥氮平和丙戊酸钠半钠)治疗(回顾性分配至对照组)。患者必须至少有6个月(发病)暴露于锂盐或任何一种对照药物,观察期内至少有两个eGFR值(一个在基线时,至少一个在基线后≥6个月)。我们排除了既往暴露于锂盐或一种对照药物的患者、既往诊断为精神分裂症或其他精神障碍的患者、基线时患有肾小球疾病、肾小管间质疾病或慢性肾脏病4 - 5期的患者,以及暴露前接受过肾移植的患者。最大随访时间为12年。数据由邓迪大学健康信息中心提供,该中心可获取基于人群的健康相关数据集,其中包含每个在地区家庭医生处注册患者的数据。每个患者都有一个唯一的十位数字标识符,即社区健康指数,使我们能够将实验室检查、社区配药处方、苏格兰发病率记录和死亡率记录与患者关联起来。所有数据均按照健康信息中心的标准操作程序进行匿名处理。主要结局是经年龄、性别和基线eGFR校正后的eGFR每年变化情况,并通过随机系数模型进行分析。
结果
1120例患者(305例暴露于锂盐,815例暴露于对照药物)符合纳入标准,在12年期间提供了13963个eGFR值。锂盐暴露的平均持续时间为55个月(标准差42;范围6 - 144)。锂盐组经年龄、性别和基线eGFR校正后的eGFR平均每年下降1.3 mL/(min·1.73 m²)(标准误0.2),与对照组(0.9 mL/(min·1.73 m²)[标准误0.15])无显著差异。在调整了其他混杂因素后,锂盐暴露导致的eGFR每月下降幅度为0.02 mL/(min·1.73 m²)(标准误0.02,p = 0.30)。作为事后次要结局,我们估计锂盐组的eGFR每年下降1.0 mL/(min·1.73 m²)(标准误0.2),同样与对照组(0.4 mL/(min·1.73 m²)[标准误0.2])无显著差异。模型确定eGFR下降的显著预测因素为年龄、基线eGFR、合并症、肾毒性药物的联合处方以及锂盐中毒发作;然而,锂盐暴露持续时间和平均血清锂水平并非eGFR下降的显著预测因素。
解读
我们的分析表明,稳定的锂盐维持治疗(锂盐水平在治疗范围内)对eGFR随时间的变化率没有影响。因此,我们的结果与以下观点相矛盾,即长期锂盐治疗在无急性中毒发作的情况下与肾毒性相关,且治疗持续时间和累积剂量是毒性的主要决定因素。
资金来源
无。