Chong Juang-Horng, Hinson Kevin R
Clemson University, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, 2200 Pocket Rd., Florence, SC 29506.
Clemson University, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 171 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634.
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Oct;108(5):2383-96. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov209. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
A 2-yr survey was conducted on golf courses in South Carolina to 1) document the species richness and seasonal activity of Scarabaeoidea; 2) assess any species compositional differences among three trap types (ultraviolet light, unbaited flight-intercept, and unbaited pitfall); and 3) identify any dominant taxa in each trap type. A total of 74,326 scarabaeoid beetles were captured, of which 77.4% were Aphodiinae (not identified to species). The remaining specimens belong to 104 species in 47 genera and 6 families. The most abundant species were Cyclocephala lurida Bland, Dyscinetus morator (F.), Euetheola humilis (Burmeister), Hybosorus illigeri Reiche, and Maladera castanea (Arrow). In all trap types, >90% of all specimens and taxa were collected between April and August. Ultraviolet light traps collected ∼94% of total specimens consisting of 83 taxa (of which 51 were unique to this trap type), whereas flight-intercept traps captured ∼2% of all specimens representing 53 taxa (18 of which were unique), and pitfall traps captured ∼4% of all specimens representing 15 taxa (no unique species; all species also captured by ultraviolet light traps). Indicator species analysis identified 2-3 and 10-13 taxa that were most frequently collected by flight-intercept and ultraviolet light traps, respectively. Flight-intercept traps complemented ultraviolet light traps by capturing more species of dung and carrion beetles and diurnal phytophagous scarab beetles. Results suggested that a similar survey for domestic or exotic scarabaeoid beetles in turfgrass systems should be conducted between April and August using ultraviolet light and flight-intercept traps at 13-58 sites.
在南卡罗来纳州的高尔夫球场进行了一项为期两年的调查,目的是:1)记录金龟总科的物种丰富度和季节性活动;2)评估三种诱捕器类型(紫外线诱捕器、无诱饵飞行拦截诱捕器和无诱饵陷阱诱捕器)之间的物种组成差异;3)确定每种诱捕器类型中的优势类群。总共捕获了74326只金龟总科甲虫,其中77.4%为隐翅甲亚科(未鉴定到种)。其余标本属于6个科47个属的104个物种。最丰富的物种是黄斑环角鳃金龟、暗黑鳃金龟、矮异丽金龟、伊氏短突鳃金龟和栗色彩丽金龟。在所有诱捕器类型中,超过90%的标本和类群是在4月至8月间采集到的。紫外线诱捕器收集了约94%的标本,共83个类群(其中51个是该诱捕器类型独有的),而飞行拦截诱捕器捕获了约2%的标本,代表53个类群(其中18个是独有的),陷阱诱捕器捕获了约4%的标本,代表15个类群(无独有物种;所有物种也被紫外线诱捕器捕获)。指示物种分析确定,飞行拦截诱捕器和紫外线诱捕器分别最常收集到2 - 3个和10 - 13个类群。飞行拦截诱捕器通过捕获更多种类的粪食性和腐食性甲虫以及日间植食性金龟子补充了紫外线诱捕器。结果表明,应在4月至8月间,在13 - 58个地点使用紫外线诱捕器和飞行拦截诱捕器,对草坪系统中的本土或外来金龟总科甲虫进行类似调查。