Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:186-94. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2746.
It is known that the relative importance of factors involved in the development of diabetic foot problems can vary in both their presence and severity between patients and lesions. This may be one of the reasons why outcomes seem to vary centre to centre and why some treatments may seem more effective in some people than others. There is a need therefore to classify and describe lesions of the foot in patients with diabetes in a manner that is agreed across all communities but is simple to use in clinical practice. No single system is currently in widespread use, although a number have been published. Not all are well validated outside the system from which they were derived, and it has not always been made clear the clinical purposes to which such classifications should be put to use, whether that be for research, clinical description in routine clinical care or audit. Here the currently published classification systems, their validation in clinical practice, whether they were designed for research, audit or clinical care, and the strengths and weaknesses of each are explored.
已知,在患者和病变之间,糖尿病足问题发展中涉及的因素的相对重要性,无论是其存在还是严重程度,都可能存在差异。这可能是为什么结果似乎在中心之间存在差异,以及为什么某些治疗方法在某些人身上比在其他人身上更有效的原因之一。因此,需要以一种在所有社区都达成共识但在临床实践中易于使用的方式对糖尿病患者的足部病变进行分类和描述。目前,尽管已经发表了许多分类系统,但没有一个系统被广泛使用。并非所有系统都在其来源系统之外得到很好的验证,而且也没有明确说明应该将这些分类用于哪些临床目的,无论是用于研究、常规临床护理中的临床描述还是审核。在这里,探讨了目前已发表的分类系统、它们在临床实践中的验证情况、它们是专为研究、审核还是临床护理设计的,以及每个系统的优缺点。