Suppr超能文献

仿制药的生物等效性。

Bioequivalence of generic drugs.

作者信息

Andrade Chittaranjan

机构信息

Department of Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;76(9):e1130-1. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15f10300.

Abstract

Generic drugs are bioequivalent to the original brand; this is a prerequisite for marketing approval. It is theoretically possible that one generic drug may overestimate the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the original and another generic may underestimate these PK parameters; in consequence, these 2 generics may not be bioequivalent between themselves. The result could be loss of efficacy or development of drug-related adverse effects if these generics are interchanged in stable patients. In a recent study involving 292 indirect comparisons of generic formulations of 9 different drugs, mathematical modeling showed that in most cases (87.0% for maximum concentration, 90.1% for area under the curve, and 80.5% for both) generic drugs are bioequivalent to each other. These reassuring findings notwithstanding, prudence dictates that, in stable patients, generic drugs should be interchanged only if there is a good reason for it. This is because bioequivalent brands of drugs may differ in their excipient content, and this can result in variations in safety profiles.

摘要

仿制药在生物等效性上与原研品牌药相当;这是获得上市批准的一个先决条件。理论上,一种仿制药可能高估原研药的药代动力学(PK)参数,而另一种仿制药可能低估这些PK参数;因此,这两种仿制药彼此之间可能不存在生物等效性。如果在病情稳定的患者中互换使用这些仿制药,结果可能是疗效丧失或出现与药物相关的不良反应。在最近一项涉及9种不同药物仿制药配方的292次间接比较的研究中,数学模型显示,在大多数情况下(最大浓度方面为87.0%,曲线下面积方面为90.1%,两者都符合的情况为80.5%),仿制药彼此之间具有生物等效性。尽管有这些令人安心的发现,但谨慎起见,对于病情稳定的患者,只有在有充分理由的情况下才应更换仿制药。这是因为具有生物等效性的不同品牌药物在辅料含量上可能存在差异,这可能导致安全性方面的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验