Heller Tamar, Gibbons Hailee M, Fisher Dora
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Oct;53(5):329-45. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-53.5.329.
This scoping review addressed the following questions: (a) What types of caregiver interventions are being done in both aging and developmental disability research? (b) How are these interventions similar and different? (c) What kinds of outcomes do these interventions have? (d) What innovative approaches are these interventions using? and (e) What can each field (developmental disabilities and gerontology) learn from the other based on this review? The disability review spanned 20 years (1992-2012), resulting in 14 studies; the aging review spanned 5 years (2008-2012), resulting in 55 studies. Data from the final selected studies were then extracted and compared on research design, type of intervention (governmental programs, small-group psychosocial, and other), and outcomes. Generally, in both fields, family-support interventions benefited participants' well-being and improved service access and satisfaction. Increased partnership between the fields of aging and developmental disabilities is critical to future scholarship in caregiving for both populations.
(a) 在衰老和发育障碍研究中正在开展哪些类型的照护者干预措施?(b) 这些干预措施有哪些异同?(c) 这些干预措施产生了哪些类型的结果?(d) 这些干预措施采用了哪些创新方法?以及(e) 根据本综述,每个领域(发育障碍和老年医学)可以从另一个领域中学到什么?发育障碍综述涵盖20年(1992 - 2012年),共14项研究;衰老综述涵盖5年(2008 - 2012年),共55项研究。然后从最终选定的研究中提取数据,并在研究设计、干预类型(政府项目、小组心理社会干预及其他)和结果方面进行比较。总体而言,在这两个领域中,家庭支持干预都有益于参与者的福祉,并改善了服务获取和满意度。加强衰老和发育障碍领域之间的合作对于这两类人群未来照护方面的学术研究至关重要。