Neal Jeremy L, Lowe Nancy K, Schorn Mavis N, Holley Sharon L, Ryan Sharon L, Buxton Margaret, Wilson-Liverman Angela M
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;60(5):499-509. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12360.
Contemporary labor and birth population norms should be the basis for evaluating labor progression and determining slow progress that may benefit from intervention. The aim of this article is to present guidelines for a common, evidence-based approach for determination of active labor onset and diagnosis of labor dystocia based on a synthesis of existing professional guidelines and relevant contemporary publications. A 3-point approach for diagnosing active labor onset and classifying labor dystocia-related labor aberrations into well-defined, mutually exclusive categories that can be used clinically and validated by researchers is proposed. The approach comprises identification of 1) an objective point that strictly defines active labor onset (point of active labor determination); 2) an objective point that identifies when labor progress becomes atypical, beyond which interventions aimed at correcting labor dystocia may be justified (point of protraction diagnosis); and 3) an objective point that identifies when interventions aimed at correcting labor dystocia, if used, can first be determined to be unsuccessful, beyond which assisted vaginal or cesarean birth may be justified (earliest point of arrest diagnosis). Widespread adoption of a common approach for diagnosing labor dystocia will facilitate consistent evaluation of labor progress, improve communications between clinicians and laboring women, indicate when intervention aimed at speeding labor progress or facilitating birth may be appropriate, and allow for more efficient translation of safe and effective management strategies into clinical practice. Correct application of the diagnosis of labor dystocia may lead to a decrease in the rate of cesarean birth, decreased health care costs, and improved health of childbearing women and neonates.
当代产程和分娩人群规范应作为评估产程进展以及确定可能受益于干预的产程进展缓慢情况的依据。本文旨在基于现有专业指南和相关当代出版物的综合内容,提出一种通用的、基于证据的方法的指南,用于确定活跃期开始和诊断产程异常。本文提出了一种三点法,用于诊断活跃期开始,并将与产程异常相关的产程偏差分类为明确的、相互排斥的类别,这些类别可用于临床并由研究人员进行验证。该方法包括确定:1)一个严格定义活跃期开始的客观点(活跃期确定点);2)一个确定产程进展何时变得异常的客观点,超过该点旨在纠正产程异常的干预可能是合理的(延长诊断点);3)一个确定如果使用旨在纠正产程异常的干预措施,何时可首先确定其不成功的客观点,超过该点阴道助产或剖宫产可能是合理的(最早停滞诊断点)。广泛采用一种通用的产程异常诊断方法将有助于对产程进展进行一致评估,改善临床医生与产妇之间的沟通,表明何时旨在加速产程进展或促进分娩的干预可能是合适的,并使安全有效的管理策略更有效地转化为临床实践。正确应用产程异常诊断可能会降低剖宫产率,降低医疗成本,并改善孕产妇和新生儿的健康状况。