Suppr超能文献

耻骨上造瘘管引流与尿道导尿管引流的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者舒适度及发病率评估

An Assessment of Patient Comfort and Morbidity After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Suprapubic Tube Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage.

作者信息

Morgan Monica S C, Ozayar Asim, Friedlander Justin I, Shakir Nabeel, Antonelli Jodi A, Bedir Selahattin, Roehrborn Claus G, Cadeddu Jeffrey A

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):300-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0206. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with suprapubic tube (SPT), compared to urethral catheter (UC) drainage, has been proposed to improve patient comfort and recovery. We sought to compare short-term outcomes for pain and morbidity after RALP with SPT vs UC drainage.

METHODS

Between August 2012 and 2014, 159 men underwent a RALP and prospectively completed a questionnaire addressing postoperative pain and satisfaction. Group 1 (n = 94) underwent a RALP by one surgeon who placed a UC and removed it between postoperative day (POD) 7 and 10. Group 2 (n = 65) underwent a RALP by a different surgeon who placed an SPT and UC. On POD 1, the UC was removed. On POD 9, the SPT was capped and removed on POD 11 if the patient was voiding adequately. Preoperative and intraoperative data, complications, questionnaires, and patient-reported morbidity, including unplanned telephone calls and emergency department (ED) visits, were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar between groups. One week after surgery, the penile pain score was statistically significantly lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (56.9% and 79.8%, respectively, reported minimal-to-moderate pain, p = 0.003). Bladder spasms and overall pain were not significantly higher for Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p > 0.05). When asked "How big a problem has your urine storage device been?," 20.2% of patients in Group 1 reported it as a "moderate-to-big" problem compared to 10.8% in Group 2 (p > 0.05). The number of catheter-related unplanned telephone encounters did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.7), however, although not statistically significant, 4.6% of patients in Group 2 presented to the ED with catheter-related issues (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

SPT after RALP was associated with less penile pain compared to UC drainage, and modestly better patient satisfaction. There were no significant differences in bladder spasms, overall pain, and patient-reported morbidity between groups.

摘要

目的

与尿道导管(UC)引流相比,耻骨上导管(SPT)辅助的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)被认为可提高患者舒适度和促进恢复。我们旨在比较采用SPT与UC引流的RALP术后疼痛和发病率的短期结果。

方法

2012年8月至2014年期间,159名男性接受了RALP手术,并前瞻性地完成了一份关于术后疼痛和满意度的问卷。第1组(n = 94)由一名外科医生进行RALP手术,该医生放置了UC,并在术后第7天至第10天之间将其拔除。第2组(n = 65)由另一名外科医生进行RALP手术,该医生放置了SPT和UC。在术后第1天,拔除UC。在术后第9天,封堵SPT,如果患者排尿正常,则在术后第11天拔除。比较两组之间的术前和术中数据、并发症、问卷以及患者报告的发病率,包括非计划的电话随访和急诊科就诊情况。

结果

两组患者的特征相似。术后一周,第2组的阴茎疼痛评分在统计学上显著低于第1组(分别有56.9%和79.8%的患者报告有轻度至中度疼痛,p = 0.003)。第1组的膀胱痉挛和总体疼痛与第2组相比无显著升高(p > 0.05)。当被问及“您的尿液储存装置带来了多大的问题?”时,第1组中有20.2%的患者将其报告为“中度至严重”问题,而第2组为10.8%(p > 0.05)。两组之间与导管相关的非计划电话随访次数没有差异(p = 0.7),然而,尽管无统计学意义,但第2组中有4.6%的患者因导管相关问题前往急诊科就诊(p = 0.07)。

结论

与UC引流相比,RALP术后采用SPT可减少阴茎疼痛,并适度提高患者满意度。两组之间在膀胱痉挛、总体疼痛和患者报告的发病率方面没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验