文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.

作者信息

Varga Zsuzsanna, Noske Aurelia

机构信息

Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0140652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140652. eCollection 2015.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0140652
PMID:26473483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4608798/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The latest guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) to test Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer after being revised in 2008 underwent a second modification in October 2013. The modification includes changes in cut-offs: 10% strong membranous staining for score 3+ on immunohistochemistry (IHC) (previously 30%) and using the ratio of >2 or absolute gene-copy-number (6 or more) alone or in combination with each other by in-situ-hybridisation technology (previously >2.2 and average copy-number of 6 or more). Hereby we addressed the question, which impact the modified cut-offs had on overall HER2-positivity in a single institution. METHODS: We prospectively analysed 617 consecutive diagnostic breast-cancer cases which underwent double HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in-situ hybridisation (FISH), using the modified 2013 ASCO/CAP-guidelines for one year (October 2013-October 2014). Results were compared with HER2-test results on 1,528 consecutive diagnostic breast-cancer cases from two previous years (2011-2012), using the 2008 ASCO/CAP guidelines, also tested with IHC and FISH in each case. RESULTS: Between October 2013 and October 2014, overall HER2-positivity was 15.8% (98 of 617 cases were either IHC 3+ or FISH amplified). 79 of 617 cases (13%) were IHC 3+, 96 of 617 cases (15.5%) were FISH amplified. Equivocal cases were seen in 25 of 617 cases (4.1%). 22 of 25 equivocal cases (88%) in 2013-2014 were IHC 1+ or 2+. In 13 equivocal cases, there was a repeated IHC/FISH testing: 2 of 13 cases (15%) became FISH amplified, 1 of 13 cases (7.5%) became IHC 3+. In 2011-2012, overall HER2-positivity (IHC/FISH) was 13.8% (211 of 1,528 cases). 185 of 1,528 cases (12%) were 3+ on IHC, 181 of 1,522 cases (12%) were amplified by FISH. Six of 1,528 cases were equivocal by FISH, and interpreted as non-amplified (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Applying the modified ASCO/CAP guidelines from 2013 resulted in an increase (2%) in overall HER2-positivity rate compared to overall-HER2-positivity rate using the 2008 ASCO/CAP guidelines. The increased positivity rate was mainly due to more FISH-positive cases (3.5% more than until 2013). The high rate of equivocal cases (4.1%) did not contribute to increase in overall HER2-positivity, but resulted in delay in definitive HER2-status.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e67/4608798/69d149bf55e9/pone.0140652.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e67/4608798/69d149bf55e9/pone.0140652.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e67/4608798/69d149bf55e9/pone.0140652.g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.

PLoS One. 2015-10-16

[2]
Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019-2-2

[3]
Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016-6

[4]
Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017-7-15

[5]
HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016-2

[6]
Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016-2

[7]
Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 determination of invasive breast cancer: A single institution experience using frontline dual-color FISH.

Breast. 2017-8

[8]
New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.

Virchows Arch. 2016-2

[9]
Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2015-8

[10]
Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.

Histopathology. 2021-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Extratumoral signs on mammography as a novel prognostic indicator for breast cancer: evidence from malignant nonspiculate and noncalcified masses.

Am J Transl Res. 2025-7-15

[2]
HER2 testing: evolution and update for a companion diagnostic assay.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025-4-7

[3]
ERBB2-amplified lobular breast carcinoma exhibits concomitant CDK12 co-amplification associated with poor prognostic features.

J Pathol Clin Res. 2024-3

[4]
Biomarker dynamics and prognosis in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Sci Rep. 2022-1-7

[5]
A study of HER2 expression in endometrial carcinoma: a single centre experience.

Pan Afr Med J. 2021

[6]
Combining Neratinib with CDK4/6, mTOR, and MEK Inhibitors in Models of HER2-positive Cancer.

Clin Cancer Res. 2021-3-15

[7]
Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.

PLoS One. 2020

[8]
Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer.

J Breast Cancer. 2020-10

[9]
Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes.

Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020-10

[10]
Deciphering HER2 Breast Cancer Disease: Biological and Clinical Implications.

Front Oncol. 2019-10-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
Impact of the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing of invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on tumours assessed as 'equivocal' for HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization.

Histopathology. 2015-12

[2]
Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer.

Pathol Res Pract. 2015-6

[3]
Predictive markers in breast cancer: An update on ER and HER2 testing and reporting.

Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015-9

[4]
[Re-evaluation of HER2 status in 1 501 invasive breast cancers according to the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathology guidelines].

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2015-1

[5]
Reply to E.A. Rakha et al.

J Clin Oncol. 2015-4-10

[6]
National guidelines and level of evidence: comments on some of the new recommendations in the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 guidelines for breast cancer.

J Clin Oncol. 2015-4-10

[7]
2013 ASCO/CAP updated guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: Impact on routine practice.

Breast. 2015-6

[8]
Accuracy and Reproducibility of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemistry: A Quality Control Study in Tuscany Evaluating the Impact of Updated 2013 ASCO/CAP Recommendations.

Pathol Oncol Res. 2015-4

[9]
Gene status in HER2 equivocal breast carcinomas: impact of distinct recommendations and contribution of a polymerase chain reaction-based method.

Oncologist. 2014-11

[10]
The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 screening tests for breast cancer suggested by the new updated recommendation of the american society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists will involve a rise of the in-situ hybridization tests for the European laboratories of pathology.

ISRN Oncol. 2014-4-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索