Ali Ather, Katz David L
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Yale University Prevention Research Center, Derby, Connecticut.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5 Suppl 3):S230-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.019.
As a discipline, preventive medicine has traditionally been described to encompass primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. The fields of preventive medicine and public health share the objectives of promoting general health, preventing disease, and applying epidemiologic techniques to these goals. This paper discusses a conceptual approach between the overlap and potential synergies of integrative medicine principles and practices with preventive medicine in the context of these levels of prevention, acknowledging the relative deficiency of research on the effectiveness of practice-based integrative care. One goal of integrative medicine is to make the widest array of appropriate options available to patients, ultimately blurring the boundaries between conventional and complementary medicine. Both disciplines should be subject to rigorous scientific inquiry so that interventions that are efficacious and effective are systematically distinguished from those that are not. Furthermore, principles of preventive medicine can be infused into prevalent practices in complementary and integrative medicine, promoting public health in the context of more responsible practices. The case is made that an integrative preventive approach involves the responsible use of science with responsiveness to the needs of patients that persist when conclusive data are exhausted, providing a framework to make clinical decisions among integrative therapies.
作为一门学科,预防医学传统上被描述为涵盖一级预防、二级预防和三级预防。预防医学和公共卫生领域有着促进总体健康、预防疾病以及将流行病学技术应用于这些目标的共同目标。本文在这些预防层面的背景下,探讨了整合医学原理与实践和预防医学之间的重叠部分及潜在协同作用的概念性方法,同时承认基于实践的整合照护有效性研究相对不足。整合医学的一个目标是为患者提供最广泛的合适选择,最终模糊传统医学与补充医学之间的界限。这两个学科都应接受严格的科学探究,以便将有效和高效的干预措施与无效的干预措施系统地区分开来。此外,预防医学原理可融入补充医学和整合医学的普遍实践中,在更负责任的实践背景下促进公共卫生。有人认为,整合性预防方法涉及在确凿数据穷尽时仍对患者需求做出响应地负责任地运用科学,为在整合疗法中做出临床决策提供一个框架。