Visalberghi Elisabetta, Sirianni Giulia, Fragaszy Dorothy, Boesch Christophe
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00197 Rome, Italy
Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 19;370(1682). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0351.
Percussive tool use holds special interest for scientists concerned with human origins. We summarize the findings from two field sites, Taï and Fazenda Boa Vista, where percussive tool use by chimpanzees and bearded capuchins, respectively, has been extensively investigated. We describe the ecological settings in which nut-cracking occurs and focus on four aspects of nut-cracking that have important cognitive implications, namely selection of tools, tool transport, tool modification and modulation of actions to reach the goal of cracking the nut. We comment on similarities and differences in behaviour and consider whether the observed differences reflect ecological, morphological, social and/or cognitive factors. Both species are sensitive to physical properties of tools, adjust their selection of hammers conditionally to the resistance of the nuts and to transport distance, and modulate the energy of their strikes under some conditions. However, chimpanzees transport hammers more frequently and for longer distances, take into account a higher number of combinations of variables and occasionally intentionally modify tools. A parsimonious interpretation of our findings is that morphological, ecological and social factors account for the observed differences. Confirmation of plausible cognitive differences in nut-cracking requires data not yet available.
敲击工具的使用引起了关注人类起源的科学家们的特别兴趣。我们总结了来自两个实地考察地点——塔伊森林和博阿维斯塔庄园的研究结果,在那里,分别对黑猩猩和胡须卷尾猴使用敲击工具的情况进行了广泛研究。我们描述了坚果开裂发生的生态环境,并重点关注坚果开裂的四个具有重要认知意义的方面,即工具的选择、工具的携带、工具的改造以及为实现坚果开裂目标而对动作的调整。我们对行为上的异同进行了评论,并思考观察到的差异是否反映了生态、形态、社会和/或认知因素。这两个物种都对工具的物理特性敏感,会根据坚果的抗性和运输距离有条件地调整锤子的选择,并在某些情况下调整敲击的力度。然而,黑猩猩更频繁、更远距离地携带锤子,考虑更多变量的组合,并且偶尔会有意改造工具。对我们研究结果的一种简约解释是,形态、生态和社会因素导致了观察到的差异。要证实坚果开裂过程中可能存在的认知差异,还需要尚未获得的数据。