Weigel S, Heindel W, Heidrich J, Heidinger O, Hense H W
Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany.
Epidemiological Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Muenster, Germany.
Rofo. 2016 Jan;188(1):33-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107835. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
The decline in advanced breast cancer stages is presumably the most relevant surrogate parameter in mammography screening. It represents the last step in the causal cascade that is expected to affect breast cancer-related mortality. To assess the effectiveness of population-based screening, we analyzed the 2-year incidence rates of advanced breast cancers between women participating in the initial and in the first subsequent round.
The study included data from 19,563 initial and 18,034 subsequent examinations of one digital screening unit (2008 - 2010). Data on tumor stages, detected by screening or within the following interval of two years (2-year incidence), were provided by the epidemiological cancer registry. Rates of all and combined UICC stages 2, 3 and 4 (advanced stages) were reported for a two-year period. Proportions were tested for significance by using chi-square tests (p < 0.001).
The 2-year incidence rate of all stages was significantly lower in participants in subsequent screening than in initial screening (0.85 vs. 1.29 per 100 women (%); p < 0.0001). A significantly lower 2-year incidence of advanced stages was observed for subsequent screening compared to initial screening (0.26 % vs. 0.48 %; p = 0.0007). Among women aged 50 to 59 years, the incidence of advanced stages was less clearly different (0.21 % vs. 0.35 %; p = 0.07) than in women aged 60 to 69 years (0.31 % vs. 0.70 %; p = 0.0008).
During the change from prevalent to incident phase mammography screening, a program impact is seen by a lower 2-year incidence of advanced breast cancers within subsequent compared to initial participants, predominately in women aged 60 to 69 years.
• The incidence of advanced tumor stages represents the most relevant surrogate parameter for screening effectiveness. • For the first time the 2-year incidence of advanced breast cancer stages after subsequent mammography screening was analyzed. • We observed a significant effect of screening on the 2-year incidence of advanced stages, predominately in the age group 60 to 69 years.
晚期乳腺癌分期的下降可能是乳腺钼靶筛查中最相关的替代参数。它代表了因果关系链中的最后一步,预计会影响乳腺癌相关死亡率。为评估基于人群的筛查效果,我们分析了参与首轮及首轮后续筛查的女性中晚期乳腺癌的2年发病率。
本研究纳入了一个数字筛查单元(2008 - 2010年)的19563例首轮检查数据和18034例后续检查数据。肿瘤分期数据由癌症流行病学登记处提供,这些数据通过筛查或在随后的两年间隔期内(2年发病率)检测得到。报告了两年期内所有UICC 2、3和4期(晚期)的发病率及合并发病率。使用卡方检验对比例进行显著性检验(p < 0.001)。
后续筛查参与者中所有分期的2年发病率显著低于首轮筛查参与者(每100名女性中分别为0.85例和1.29例(%);p < 0.0001)。与首轮筛查相比,后续筛查中晚期分期的2年发病率显著更低(0.26%对0.48%;p = 0.0007)。在50至59岁的女性中,晚期分期的发病率差异不如60至69岁女性明显(0.21%对0.35%;p = 0.07)(0.31%对0.70%;p = 0.0008)。
在从现患期到新发病例期的乳腺钼靶筛查转变过程中,可以看到与首轮参与者相比,后续参与者中晚期乳腺癌的2年发病率更低,这体现了筛查项目的影响,主要体现在60至69岁的女性中。
• 晚期肿瘤分期的发病率是筛查效果最相关的替代参数。• 首次分析了后续乳腺钼靶筛查后晚期乳腺癌分期的2年发病率。• 我们观察到筛查对晚期分期的2年发病率有显著影响,主要体现在60至69岁年龄组。