Johnson Brittany J, Hendrie Gilly A, Golley Rebecca K
1Division of Health Sciences,Sansom Institute for Health Research,University of South Australia,North Terrace,GPO Box 2471,Adelaide,SA 5001,Australia.
2Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation Food and Nutrition Flagship,Adelaide,South Australia,Australia.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun;19(9):1684-95. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002992. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
To systematically review the literature and map published studies on 4-8-year-olds' intake of discretionary choices against an ecological framework (ANalysis Grid for Environments Linked to Obesity; ANGELO).
Articles were identified through database searches (PubMed, PyscINFO®, Web of Science) in February and March 2014 and hand-searching reference lists. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and mapped against the ANGELO framework by environment size (macro and micro setting) and type (physical, economic, policy and socio-cultural influences).
Studies were conducted in the USA (n 18), Australia (n 6), the UK (n 3), the Netherlands (n 3), Belgium (n 1), Germany (n 1) and Turkey (n 1).
Children aged 4-8 years, or parents/other caregivers.
Thirty-three studies met the review criteria (observational n 23, interventions n 10). Home was the most frequently studied setting (67 % of exposures/strategies), with the majority of these studies targeting family policy-type influences (e.g. child feeding practices, television regulation). Few studies were undertaken in government (5·5 %) or community (11 %) settings, or examined economic-type influences (0 %). Of the intervention studies only four were categorised as effective.
The present review is novel in its focus on mapping observational and intervention studies across a range of settings. It highlights the urgent need for high-quality research to inform interventions that directly tackle the factors influencing children's excess intake of discretionary choices. Interventions that assist in optimising a range of environmental influences will enhance the impact of future public health interventions to improve child diet quality.
系统回顾文献,并依据生态框架(与肥胖相关的环境分析网格;ANGELO)梳理已发表的关于4至8岁儿童自由选择食物摄入量的研究。
2014年2月和3月通过数据库检索(PubMed、PsycINFO®、科学网)及手工检索参考文献列表来识别文章。评估研究的方法学质量,并依据环境规模(宏观和微观环境)及类型(物理、经济、政策和社会文化影响)与ANGELO框架进行映射分析。
研究在美国(18项)、澳大利亚(6项)、英国(3项)、荷兰(3项)、比利时(1项)、德国(1项)和土耳其(1项)开展。
4至8岁儿童,或父母/其他照料者。
33项研究符合综述标准(观察性研究23项,干预性研究10项)。家庭是研究最频繁的环境(67%的暴露/策略),其中大多数研究针对家庭政策类型的影响(如儿童喂养方式、电视管理)。很少有研究在政府(5.5%)或社区(11%)环境中进行,或考察经济类型的影响(0%)。在干预性研究中,只有四项被归类为有效。
本综述的新颖之处在于专注于梳理一系列环境中的观察性和干预性研究。它突出了迫切需要高质量研究为直接解决影响儿童自由选择食物过量摄入因素的干预措施提供信息。有助于优化一系列环境影响的干预措施将增强未来公共卫生干预措施改善儿童饮食质量的效果。