J.D. Gonzalo is assistant professor of medicine and public health sciences and associate dean for health systems education, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. P. Haidet is professor of medicine, humanities, and public health sciences and director of medical education research, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. K.K. Papp is adjunct professor of medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. D.R. Wolpaw is professor of medicine and humanities, vice chair for educational affairs, Department of Medicine, and director, Kienle Center for Humanistic Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. E. Moser is associate professor of medicine and associate dean for medical education, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. R.D. Wittenstein is assistant professor of public health sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, and chief operating officer, Penn State Hershey Health System, Hershey, Pennsylvania. T. Wolpaw is professor of medicine and vice dean for educational affairs, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):35-39. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000951.
In the face of a fragmented and poorly performing health care delivery system, medical education in the United States is poised for disruption. Despite broad-based recommendations to better align physician training with societal needs, adaptive change has been slow. Traditionally, medical education has focused on the basic and clinical sciences, largely removed from the newer systems sciences such as population health, policy, financing, health care delivery, and teamwork. In this article, authors examine the current state of medical education with respect to systems sciences and propose a new framework for educating physicians in adapting to and practicing in systems-based environments. Specifically, the authors propose an educational shift from a two-pillar framework to a three-pillar framework where basic, clinical, and systems sciences are interdependent. In this new three-pillar framework, students not only learn the interconnectivity in the basic, clinical, and systems sciences but also uncover relevance and meaning in their education through authentic, value-added, and patient-centered roles as navigators within the health care system. Authors describe the Systems Navigation Curriculum, currently implemented for all students at the Penn State College of Medicine, as an example of this three-pillar educational model. Simple adjustments, such as including occasional systems topics in medical curriculum, will not foster graduates prepared to practice in the 21st-century health care system. Adequate preparation requires an explicit focus on the systems sciences as a vital and equal component of physician education.
面对支离破碎且绩效不佳的医疗服务体系,美国的医学教育正面临着颠覆。尽管人们广泛建议更好地使医师培训与社会需求保持一致,但适应性变革一直较为缓慢。传统上,医学教育侧重于基础和临床科学,而与新兴的系统科学(如人群健康、政策、融资、医疗服务提供和团队合作)基本脱节。在本文中,作者审视了医学教育在系统科学方面的现状,并提出了一个新的框架,以培养医生适应和在基于系统的环境中执业的能力。具体来说,作者提出了一个教育转变,从两支柱框架转变为三支柱框架,其中基础、临床和系统科学是相互依存的。在这个新的三支柱框架中,学生不仅学习基础、临床和系统科学之间的相互联系,而且通过作为医疗系统中的导航者的真实、增值和以患者为中心的角色,发现他们教育中的相关性和意义。作者描述了宾夕法尼亚州立大学医学院目前为所有学生实施的系统导航课程,作为这种三支柱教育模式的一个例子。简单的调整,如偶尔在医学课程中加入系统主题,不会培养出有能力在 21 世纪医疗体系中执业的毕业生。充分的准备需要明确关注系统科学,将其作为医师教育的一个重要且同等重要的组成部分。