Simoneti Christian Silva, Freitas Amanda Souza, Barbosa Michelle Christiane Rodrigues, Ferraz Erica, de Menezes Marcelo Bezerra, Bagatin Ericson, Arruda Luisa Karla, Vianna Elcio Oliveira
Department of Medicine, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo.
J Occup Health. 2016;58(1):7-15. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0045-OA. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
The aim of this estudy was to investigate the influence of allergen exposure levels and other risk factors for allergic sensitization, asthma, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in workers exposed to laboratory animals.
This was a cross-sectional study performed at two universities, 123 workplaces with 737 subjects. Dust samples were collected from laboratories and animal facilities housing rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, or hamsters and analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure allergen concentrations. We also sampled workplaces without animals. Asthma was defined by both symptoms and BHR to mannitol. The concentrations of allergens were tested for association with a skin prick test, respiratory symptoms, spirometry data, and BHR. This multivariate analysis was performed by using Poisson regression to estimate the relative risk (RR) for the exposed group.
Our sample comprised students and workers, with 336 subjects in the nonexposed group and 401 subjects in the exposed group. Sixty-nine subjects (17%) had positive results in the skin prick test for animal allergens in the exposed group; in the nonexposed group, 10 subjects had positive results (3%) (p<0.001). Exposure to laboratory animals over 2.8 years was associated with atopic sensitization (RR=1.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-3.15; p=0.02). Allergen concentration was not associated with sensitization, asthma, or BHR.
Exposure to laboratory animals was associated with atopic sensitization. However, we did not find a cutoff allergen concentration that increased the risk for sensitization. Duration of exposure seems to be more relevant to sensitization than concentration of allergens in dust.
本研究旨在调查暴露于实验动物的工作人员中,变应原暴露水平及其他变应性致敏、哮喘和支气管高反应性(BHR)风险因素的影响。
这是一项在两所大学进行的横断面研究,涉及123个工作场所的737名受试者。从饲养大鼠、小鼠、豚鼠、兔子或仓鼠的实验室和动物设施中采集灰尘样本,并用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)分析以测量变应原浓度。我们还对没有动物的工作场所进行了采样。哮喘通过症状和对甘露醇的支气管高反应性来定义。测试变应原浓度与皮肤点刺试验、呼吸道症状、肺功能测定数据和支气管高反应性之间的关联。使用泊松回归进行多变量分析,以估计暴露组的相对风险(RR)。
我们的样本包括学生和工作人员,非暴露组有336名受试者,暴露组有401名受试者。暴露组中有69名受试者(17%)动物变应原皮肤点刺试验结果呈阳性;在非暴露组中,有10名受试者呈阳性(3%)(p<0.001)。暴露于实验动物超过2.8年与特应性致敏相关(RR=1.85;95%置信区间:1.09-3.15;p=0.02)。变应原浓度与致敏、哮喘或支气管高反应性无关。
暴露于实验动物与特应性致敏相关。然而,我们未发现增加致敏风险的变应原浓度阈值。暴露持续时间似乎比灰尘中变应原浓度与致敏更相关。