Suppr超能文献

一项可行性研究,旨在为一项随机对照试验的设计提供信息,以确定低分子量肝素抗凝治疗癌症相关血栓形成(ALICAT)的最具临床疗效和成本效益的疗程。

A feasibility study to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial to identify the most clinically effective and cost-effective length of Anticoagulation with Low-molecular-weight heparin In the treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (ALICAT).

作者信息

Noble Simon I, Nelson Annmarie, Fitzmaurice David, Bekkers Marie-Jet, Baillie Jessica, Sivell Stephanie, Canham Joanna, Smith Joanna D, Casbard Angela, Cohen Ander, Cohen David, Evans Jessica, Fletcher Kate, Johnson Miriam, Maraveyas Anthony, Prout Hayley, Hood Kerenza

机构信息

Wales Cancer Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(83):vii-xxiii, 1-93. doi: 10.3310/hta19830.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism is common in cancer patients and requires anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Current data recommend LMWH for anticoagulation as far as 6 months, yet guidelines recommend LMWH beyond 6 months in patients who have ongoing or active cancer. This recommendation, based on expert consensus, has not been evaluated in a clinical study.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To identify the most clinically and cost-effective length of anticoagulation with LMWH in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT); (2) to identify practicalities of conducting a full randomised controlled trial (RCT) with regard to recruitment, retention and outcome measurement; and (3) to explore the barriers for progressing to a full RCT.

DESIGN

The Anticoagulation with Low-molecular-weight heparin In the treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (ALICAT) trial is a randomised, multicentre, feasibility mixed-methods study with three components: (1) a RCT comparing ongoing LMWH treatment for CAT with cessation of LMWH at 6 months' treatment (current licensed practice) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer, consulted in three clinical settings (haematology outpatients, oncology outpatients and primary care); (2) a nested qualitative study, including focus groups with clinicians to investigate attitudes for recruiting to the study and identify the challenges of progressing to a full RCT, and semistructured interviews with patients and relatives to explore their attitudes towards participating in the study, and potential barriers and concerns to participation; and (3) a UK-wide survey exercise to develop a classification and enumeration system for the CAT models and pathways of care.

SETTING

A haematology outpatients department, an oncology outpatients department and primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with ongoing active or metastatic cancer who have received 6 months of LMWH for CAT.

INTERVENTIONS

Ongoing LMWH treatment for CAT versus cessation of LMWH at 6 months' treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(i) The number of eligible patients over 12 months; (ii) the number of recruited patients over 12 months (target recruitment rate of 30% of eligible patients); and (iii) the proportion of randomised participants with recurrent venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) during follow-up.

RESULTS

Following several delays in setting up the RCT component of the study, 5 out of 32 eligible patients consented to be randomised to the RCT suggesting progression to a full RCT was not feasible. Reasons for non-consenting were primarily based on a fixed preference for continuing or discontinuing treatment after 6 months of anticoagulation, and a fear of randomisation to their non-preferred option. Views were largely influenced by patients' initial experience of CAT. Focus groups with clinicians revealed that they would be reticent to recruit to such a study as they had fixed views of best management despite the lack of evidence. Patient pathway modelling suggested that there is a broad heterogeneity of practice with respect to CAT management and co-ordination, with no consensus on which specialty should best manage such cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the RCT reflect recruitment from the oncology site only and provide no recruitment data from haematology centres. However, it is unlikely that these other sites would have access to more eligible patients. The management of cancer-associated thrombosis beyond 6 months will remain a clinical challenge. As it is unlikely that a prospective study will successfully recruit, other strategies to accrue relevant data are necessary. Currently the LONGHEVA (Long-term treatment for cancer patients with deep-venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) registry is in development to prospectively evaluate this important and common clinical scenario.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as clinical trials.gov number NCT01817257 and International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 37913976.

FUNDING DETAILS

Funding for the ALICAT trial was provided by the Health Technology Assessment programme (10/145/01) in response to a themed funding call. The study was designed in accordance with the initial funding brief and feedback from the review process.

摘要

背景

静脉血栓栓塞在癌症患者中很常见,需要使用低分子量肝素(LMWH)进行抗凝治疗。目前的数据推荐LMWH抗凝治疗长达6个月,但指南建议对于仍有持续或活动性癌症的患者,LMWH抗凝治疗应超过6个月。这一基于专家共识的建议尚未在临床研究中得到评估。

目的

(1)确定LMWH抗凝治疗癌症相关血栓形成(CAT)的最具临床和成本效益的疗程;(2)确定在招募、保留和结果测量方面进行全面随机对照试验(RCT)的实际情况;(3)探索推进全面RCT的障碍。

设计

低分子量肝素治疗癌症相关血栓形成(ALICAT)试验是一项随机、多中心、可行性混合方法研究,包括三个部分:(1)一项RCT,比较局部晚期或转移性癌症患者持续使用LMWH治疗CAT与在6个月治疗时停止使用LMWH(当前许可做法),在三个临床环境(血液科门诊、肿瘤科门诊和初级保健)中进行咨询;(2)一项嵌套的定性研究,包括与临床医生的焦点小组,以调查招募到该研究的态度,并确定推进全面RCT的挑战,以及与患者和亲属的半结构式访谈,以探索他们参与该研究的态度,以及参与的潜在障碍和担忧;(3)一项全英国范围的调查活动,以开发CAT模型和护理途径的分类和枚举系统。

地点

血液科门诊、肿瘤科门诊和初级保健机构。

参与者

因CAT接受了6个月LMWH治疗的持续活动性或转移性癌症患者。

干预措施

局部晚期或转移性癌症患者持续使用LMWH治疗CAT与在6个月治疗时停止使用LMWH。

主要结局指标

(i)12个月内符合条件的患者数量;(ii)12个月内招募的患者数量(目标招募率为符合条件患者的30%);(iii)随访期间随机参与者复发性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的比例。

结果

在该研究的RCT部分设置多次延迟后,32名符合条件的患者中有5名同意被随机分配到RCT,这表明推进全面RCT不可行。不同意的主要原因主要基于在抗凝6个月后对继续或停止治疗的固定偏好,以及对被随机分配到其不喜欢的选项的恐惧。观点在很大程度上受患者CAT初始经历的影响。与临床医生的焦点小组表明,尽管缺乏证据,但他们对招募到这样一项研究持保留态度,因为他们对最佳管理有固定看法。患者途径建模表明,在CAT管理和协调方面存在广泛的实践异质性,对于应由哪个专科最佳管理此类病例没有共识。

结论

RCT的结果仅反映了来自肿瘤学站点的招募情况,没有提供血液学中心的招募数据。然而,其他这些站点不太可能有更多符合条件的患者。癌症相关血栓形成超过6个月的管理仍将是一项临床挑战。由于前瞻性研究不太可能成功招募,因此有必要采用其他策略来积累相关数据。目前,LONGHEVA(癌症患者深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞的长期治疗)登记正在开展,以前瞻性评估这一重要且常见的临床情况。

研究注册

本研究注册为临床试验.gov编号NCT01817257和国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)37913976。资助详情:ALICAT试验的资金由卫生技术评估计划(10/145/01)提供,以响应主题资助呼吁。该研究是根据初始资助简报和评审过程中的反馈设计的。

相似文献

5
Stopping anticoagulation for isolated or incidental pulmonary embolism: the STOPAPE RCT protocol.
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;29(11):1-17. doi: 10.3310/HRCW7937.
7
Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2(2):CD006771. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006771.pub3.
8
Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparins for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD007557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007557.pub3.
10
Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;1(1):CD003076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003076.pub3.

引用本文的文献

4
Commentary: An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research.
J Res Nurs. 2020 Aug;25(5):458-459. doi: 10.1177/1744987119881056. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: Treatment and prevention with rivaroxaban.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Apr 4;4(4):532-549. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12327. eCollection 2020 May.
8
Patient healthcare trajectory. An essential monitoring tool: a systematic review.
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2017 Apr 12;5(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s13755-017-0020-2. eCollection 2017 Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验