Suppr超能文献

重新审视乳腺癌医院及手术量与死亡率的关系:一项工具变量分析

Reexamining the Relationship of Breast Cancer Hospital and Surgical Volume to Mortality: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

作者信息

Pezzin Liliana E, Laud Purushottam, Yen Tina W F, Neuner Joan, Nattinger Ann B

机构信息

*Department of Medicine †Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research ‡Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society §Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.

出版信息

Med Care. 2015 Dec;53(12):1033-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000439.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To reexamine the relationship of hospital and surgical volume to all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, taking into account the potential selection bias in patients treated at high-volume centers or by high-volume surgeons.

DATA SOURCES

Elderly (65+) women with early-stage, incident breast cancer surgery in 2003.

STUDY DESIGN

A population-based, prospective survey study.

METHODS

Two-stage, instrumental variable regression models.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Women treated in high-volume hospitals were significantly less likely to die of any cause by 5 years after surgery, even after adjustments for self-selection and a number of other factors. The relationship was larger and more significant for breast cancer-specific mortality. Although the general pattern of better mortality outcomes held for moderately sized hospitals, the relationships were not statistically significant. In contrast, there was no relationship of surgeon volume with all-cause or breast cancer-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital volume, but not surgeon volume, is associated with better survival among women with breast cancer. The magnitude of the potential improvement was substantial and comparable with the benefit conferred by many systemic therapies. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for patient self-selection in volume-outcome analyses, and provide support for policy initiatives aimed at regionalizing breast cancer care in the United States.

摘要

目的

重新审视医院规模和手术量与全因死亡率及乳腺癌特异性死亡率之间的关系,同时考虑在高手术量中心接受治疗或由高手术量外科医生治疗的患者中可能存在的选择偏倚。

数据来源

2003年接受早期原发性乳腺癌手术的65岁及以上老年女性。

研究设计

一项基于人群的前瞻性调查研究。

方法

两阶段工具变量回归模型。

主要发现

在高手术量医院接受治疗的女性在术后5年内死于任何原因的可能性显著降低,即使在对自我选择和其他一些因素进行调整之后也是如此。这种关系在乳腺癌特异性死亡率方面更大且更显著。虽然中等规模医院的死亡率改善总体模式也存在,但这种关系在统计学上并不显著。相比之下,外科医生手术量与全因死亡率或乳腺癌特异性死亡率之间没有关系。

结论

医院手术量而非外科医生手术量与乳腺癌女性患者更好的生存率相关。潜在改善的幅度很大,与许多全身治疗带来的益处相当。这些发现凸显了在手术量-预后分析中考虑患者自我选择的重要性,并为美国旨在将乳腺癌护理区域化的政策举措提供了支持。

相似文献

2
Influence of treatment center and hospital volume on survival for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Dec;139(3):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 12.
3
Impact of hospital volume on breast cancer outcome: a population-based study in the Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Aug;147(1):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3075-7. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
5
Hospital center effect for laparoscopic colectomy among elderly stage I-III colon cancer patients.
Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):924-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829d0468.
8
9
Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Mar;97(3):539-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075663. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
10
Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jul;110(2):349-56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9715-4. Epub 2007 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect on Travel Distance of a Statewide Regionalization Policy for Initial Breast Cancer Surgery.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan;43(1):57-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02638. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
ASO Author Reflections: Extending Optimal Care for Breast Cancer to the Elderly Population.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6471-6472. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13776-x. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
3
Associations Between Hospital Volume and Overall Survival After Surgery in Older Patients with Breast Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6462-6470. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13725-8. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Surgeon Factors Influencing Breast Surgery Outcomes: A Scoping Review to Define the Modern Breast Surgical Oncologist.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4695-4713. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13472-w. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
6
Centralization of Initial Care and Improved Survival of Poor Patients With Breast Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 10;41(11):2067-2075. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02012. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
7
Breast Cancer Treatment in Integrated Care Process in Andalusia: The Challenge of Multidisciplinarity.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;19(19):12728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912728.
10
Systematic review of prospective studies focused on regionalization of care in surgical oncology.
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1699-1707. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01073-9. Epub 2021 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The state of cancer care in America, 2014: a report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Mar;10(2):119-42. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001386. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
3
Socioeconomic and racial differences in treatment for breast cancer at a low-volume hospital.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3220-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2001-z. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
4
The effect of hospital volume on the outcome of breast cancer surgery.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1684-90. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1514-1. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
5
Heightened attention to medical privacy: challenges for unbiased sample recruitment and a possible solution.
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Sep 15;172(6):637-44. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq220. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
7
Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Apr;208(4):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.019.
8
Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):531-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
9
Exploring the surgeon volume outcome relationship among women with breast cancer.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 8;167(18):1958-63. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.18.1958.
10
Survival after breast cancer treatment: the impact of provider volume.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):749-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00748.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验