基于前列腺特异性膜抗原的 18F-DCFBC PET/CT 与常规影像学方法在检测激素初治和去势抵抗性转移性前列腺癌中的比较。

Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT to Conventional Imaging Modalities for Detection of Hormone-Naïve and Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.

The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2016 Jan;57(1):46-53. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163782. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Conventional imaging modalities (CIMs) have limited sensitivity and specificity for detection of metastatic prostate cancer. We examined the potential of a first-in-class radiofluorinated small-molecule inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-(18)F-fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine ((18)F-DCFBC), to detect metastatic hormone-naïve (HNPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

METHODS

Seventeen patients were prospectively enrolled (9 HNPC and 8 CRPC); 16 had CIM evidence of new or progressive metastatic prostate cancer and 1 had high clinical suspicion of metastatic disease. (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT imaging was obtained with 2 successive PET scans starting at 2 h after injection. Patients were imaged with CIM at approximately the time of PET. A lesion-by-lesion analysis of PET to CIM was performed in the context of either HNPC or CRPC. The patients were followed with available clinical imaging as a reference standard to determine the true nature of identified lesions on PET and CIM.

RESULTS

On the lesion-by-lesion analysis, (18)F-DCFBC PET was able to detect a larger number of lesions (592 positive with 63 equivocal) than CIM (520 positive with 61 equivocal) overall, in both HNPC and CRPC patients. (18)F-DCFBC PET detection of lymph nodes, bone lesions, and visceral lesions was superior to CIM. When intrapatient clustering effects were considered, (18)F-DCFBC PET was estimated to be positive in a large proportion of lesions that would be negative or equivocal on CIM (0.45). On follow-up, the sensitivity of (18)F-DCFBC PET (0.92) was superior to CIM (0.71). (18)F-DCFBC tumor uptake was increased at the later PET time point (~2.5 h after injection), with background uptake showing a decreasing trend on later PET.

CONCLUSION

PET imaging with (18)F-DCFBC, a small-molecule PSMA-targeted radiotracer, detected more lesions than CIM and promises to diagnose and stage patients with metastatic prostate cancer more accurately than current imaging methods.

摘要

未加标签

传统成像方式(CIMs)在检测转移性前列腺癌方面的灵敏度和特异性有限。我们研究了首例放射性氟标记的前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)小分子抑制剂 N-[N-[(S)-1,3-二羧基丙基]氨甲酰]-4-(18)F-氟苄基-l-半胱氨酸((18)F-DCFBC)检测转移性去势敏感型(HNPC)和去势抵抗型前列腺癌(CRPC)的潜力。

方法

前瞻性纳入 17 例患者(9 例 HNPC 和 8 例 CRPC);16 例有 CIM 证据显示新发或进展性转移性前列腺癌,1 例有转移性疾病的高度临床怀疑。注射后 2 小时开始进行 2 次连续的 (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT 扫描。在大约进行 PET 的时间,用 CIM 对患者进行成像。根据 HNPC 或 CRPC,对 PET 和 CIM 的每一个病灶进行了病变分析。通过现有临床影像学作为参考标准,对 PET 和 CIM 上确定的病灶的真实性质进行了随访。

结果

在病变分析中,(18)F-DCFBC PET 能够比 CIM 检测到更多的病变(592 个阳性,63 个可疑),无论是在 HNPC 还是 CRPC 患者中。(18)F-DCFBC PET 检测淋巴结、骨病变和内脏病变的效果优于 CIM。当考虑到患者内聚类效应时,(18)F-DCFBC PET 估计在很大比例的 CIM 阴性或可疑的病变中为阳性(0.45)。在随访中,(18)F-DCFBC PET 的灵敏度(0.92)优于 CIM(0.71)。(18)F-DCFBC 肿瘤摄取在较晚的 PET 时间点(注射后约 2.5 小时)增加,而背景摄取在较晚的 PET 中呈下降趋势。

结论

使用小分子 PSMA 靶向放射性示踪剂 (18)F-DCFBC 的 PET 成像比 CIM 检测到更多的病变,有望比目前的成像方法更准确地诊断和分期转移性前列腺癌患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索