Akhtar Naveed, Kamran Saadat, Singh Rajvir, Cameron Peter, D'Souza Atlantic, Imam Yahya, Bourke Paula, Joseph Sujatha, Khan Rabia, Santos Mark, Deleu Dirk, El-Zouki Abdel, Abou-Samra Abdul, Butt Adeel A, Shuaib Ashfaq
From the Neuroscience Institute (Stroke Center of Excellence) (N.A., S.K., A.D., Y.I., P.B., S.J., R.K., M.S., D.D., A.S.), Departments of Emergency Medicine (P.C.), Internal Medicine (A.E.-Z., A.A.-S.), Cardiology Research Center (R.S.), and Hamad Healthcare Quality Institute (A.A.B.), Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3494-501. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010552. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
Usefulness of multidisciplinary stroke units in acute stroke patients is well established. There is extensive western literature on usefulness of stroke units in outcome, but limited evidence from the rest of the world. We aim to evaluate the impact of establishing a stroke unit on outcome in patients presenting to a tertiary care facility.
This is a retrospective study of 1003 patients with acute stroke admitted to Hamad General Hospital, Qatar, between January 2014 and February 2015. Patients directly admitted to intensive care unit (132) were excluded. We compared outcomes of pre- and poststroke ward (SW) establishment and in SW patients versus those of general medical wards.
Before the establishment of the SW, 175 patients were admitted to the hospital. From April 2014 to February 2015, 696 patients were admitted (SW, 545; medical ward, 151). There was a significant reduction in length of stay from 14.7±27.7 to 6.2±20.2 days (P=0.0001) and incidence of complications (23.6% versus 6.4%, P=0.0001) after implementation of stroke-specific protocols. Prognosis at discharge (modified Rankin Scale 0-2 in 56.0% versus 70.4%, P=0.001) and at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale 0-2 in 70.6% versus 95.0%, P=0.001) also significantly improved. Compared with medical ward patients, outcome was significantly better in SW patients with fewer complications (10.9% versus 5.0%, P=0.013) and shorter length of stay (8.9±30.7 versus 5.4±16.1 days, P=0.05).
Establishing a distinct SW is essential for achieving full benefits of stroke protocols implementation. SW patients have significantly fewer complications and better prognosis when compared with patients in medical wards.
多学科卒中单元对急性卒中患者的有效性已得到充分证实。西方有大量关于卒中单元对预后影响的文献,但世界其他地区的相关证据有限。我们旨在评估在一家三级医疗机构建立卒中单元对患者预后的影响。
这是一项对2014年1月至2015年2月期间入住卡塔尔哈马德总医院的1003例急性卒中患者的回顾性研究。直接入住重症监护病房的132例患者被排除。我们比较了卒中病房设立前后以及卒中病房患者与普通内科病房患者的预后情况。
在卒中病房设立之前,有175例患者入院。从2014年4月至2015年2月,有696例患者入院(卒中病房545例,内科病房151例)。实施卒中专项方案后,住院时间从14.7±27.7天显著缩短至6.2±20.2天(P = 0.0001),并发症发生率也显著降低(23.6%对6.4%,P = 0.0001)。出院时(改良Rankin量表0 - 2级:56.0%对70.4%,P = 0.001)和90天时(改良Rankin量表0 - 2级:70.6%对95.0%,P = 0.001)的预后也有显著改善。与内科病房患者相比,卒中病房患者的并发症更少(10.9%对5.0%,P = 0.013),住院时间更短(8.9±30.7天对5.4±16.1天,P = 0.05),预后明显更好。
建立独立的卒中病房对于充分实现卒中方案实施的益处至关重要。与内科病房患者相比,卒中病房患者的并发症显著减少,预后更好。