Suppr超能文献

预防性放置补片预防造口旁疝:一项前瞻性多中心随机试验的早期结果

Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial.

作者信息

Brandsma H T, Hansson B M E, Aufenacker T J, van Geldere D, van Lammeren F M, Mahabier C, Steenvoorde P, de Vries Reilingh T S, Wiezer R J, de Wilt J H W, Bleichrodt R P, Rosman C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hernia. 2016 Aug;20(4):535-41. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1427-9. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication after colostomy formation. Recent studies indicate that mesh implantation during formation of a colostomy might prevent a PSH. To determine if placement of a retromuscular mesh at the colostomy site is a feasible, safe and effective procedure in preventing a parastomal hernia, we performed a multicentre randomized controlled trial in 11 large teaching hospitals and three university centres in The Netherlands.

METHODS

Augmentation of the abdominal wall with a retromuscular light-weight polypropylene mesh (Parietene Light™, Covidien) around the trephine was compared with traditional colostomy formation. Patients undergoing elective open formation of a permanent end-colostomy were eligible. 150 patients were randomized between 2010 and 2012. Primary endpoint of the PREVENT trial is the incidence of parastomal hernia. Secondary endpoints are morbidity, pain, quality of life, mortality and cost-effectiveness. This article focussed on the early results of the PREVENT trial and, therefore, operation time, postoperative morbidity, pain, and quality of life were measured.

RESULTS

Outcomes represent results after 3 months of follow-up. A total of 150 patients were randomized. Mean operation time of the mesh group (N = 72) was significantly longer than in the control group (N = 78) (182.6 vs. 156.8 min; P = 0.018). Four (2.7 %) peristomal infections occurred of which one (1.4 %) in the mesh group. No infection of the mesh occurred. Most of the other infections were infections of the perineal wound, equally distributed over both groups. No statistical differences were discovered in stoma or mesh-related complications, fistula or stricture formation, pain, or quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

During open and elective formation of an end-colostomy, primary placement of a retromuscular light-weight polypropylene mesh for prevention of a parastomal hernia is a safe and feasible procedure. The PREVENT trial is registered at: http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2018 .

摘要

目的

造口旁疝(PSH)是结肠造口术后的常见并发症。近期研究表明,结肠造口形成过程中植入补片可能预防PSH。为确定在结肠造口部位放置肌后补片预防造口旁疝是否为可行、安全且有效的方法,我们在荷兰的11家大型教学医院和3所大学中心开展了一项多中心随机对照试验。

方法

将在环钻周围使用肌后轻质聚丙烯补片(Parietene Light™,柯惠医疗)增强腹壁与传统结肠造口形成方法进行比较。接受择期开放性永久性结肠造口术的患者符合条件。2010年至2012年期间对150例患者进行了随机分组。PREVENT试验的主要终点是造口旁疝发病率。次要终点包括发病率、疼痛、生活质量、死亡率和成本效益。本文重点关注PREVENT试验的早期结果,因此测量了手术时间、术后发病率、疼痛和生活质量。

结果

结果代表随访3个月后的情况。共150例患者被随机分组。补片组(N = 72)的平均手术时间显著长于对照组(N = 78)(182.6分钟对156.8分钟;P = 0.018)。发生了4例(2.7%)造口周围感染,其中补片组1例(1.4%)。未发生补片感染。其他大多数感染为会阴伤口感染,两组分布均衡。在造口或补片相关并发症、瘘管或狭窄形成、疼痛或生活质量方面未发现统计学差异。

结论

在开放性择期结肠造口形成术中,初次放置肌后轻质聚丙烯补片预防造口旁疝是一种安全可行的方法。PREVENT试验注册于:http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2018

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验