Suppr超能文献

用于电子显微镜检查的改进松果体固定程序。

Improved procedures for pineal gland fixation for electron microscopy.

作者信息

Schultz R L, Whitter E F

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, California 92350.

出版信息

J Pineal Res. 1989;6(3):267-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079x.1989.tb00423.x.

Abstract

The common procedures used for preparing some organs and tissues for electron microscopy, in which a fixative with the buffer portion adjusted to near-isotonicity to plasma is perfused in vivo, causes intolerable shrinkage of rat pineal cells. The present study was undertaken to optimize the parameters involved in the fixation of the pineal gland. The buffer and its concentration and the aldehyde or aldehydes used were among the variables investigated. The buffers tried were phosphate, cacodylate, PIPES, and HEPES. Decreasing the buffer concentration prevented shrinkage with all four buffers. The optimum concentrations were 0.05 M phosphate, 0.07 M cacodylate, 0.05 M or 0.057 M PIPES, and 0.1 M HEPES. PIPES and HEPES were clearly superior in retaining cytoplasmic density when compared with phosphate or cacodylate. The use of lithium PIPES and HEPES instead of the sodium equivalents enhanced membrane detail. A small volume of more concentrated aldehyde fixative perfused ahead of the main perfusate (a strong prewash) definitely helped prevent shrinkage. Using a mixture of aldehydes consisting of glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, and acrolein reduced the tendency for shrinkage when compared with glutaraldehyde only. Some of the shrinkage space artefacts could be easily misinterpreted as normal features. Since the pineal gland commonly contains degenerating structures, a dependable fixation procedure is particularly needed. Also, accurate preservation is essential in the evaluation of physiological changes.

摘要

一些用于电子显微镜检查的器官和组织制备的常规程序,即在体内灌注缓冲部分调整至接近血浆等渗性的固定剂,会导致大鼠松果体细胞出现无法忍受的收缩。本研究旨在优化松果体固定所涉及的参数。所研究的变量包括缓冲剂及其浓度以及所使用的一种或多种醛类。尝试过的缓冲剂有磷酸盐、二甲胂酸盐、哌嗪-N,N'-双(2-乙烷磺酸)(PIPES)和4-(2-羟乙基)-1-哌嗪乙磺酸(HEPES)。降低缓冲剂浓度可防止使用所有四种缓冲剂时出现收缩。最佳浓度分别为0.05M磷酸盐、0.07M二甲胂酸盐、0.05M或0.057M PIPES以及0.1M HEPES。与磷酸盐或二甲胂酸盐相比,PIPES和HEPES在保持细胞质密度方面明显更优。使用锂盐形式的PIPES和HEPES而非钠盐形式可增强膜的细节。在主要灌注液之前灌注少量更浓缩的醛类固定剂(强力预冲洗)肯定有助于防止收缩。与仅使用戊二醛相比,使用由戊二醛、甲醛和丙烯醛组成的醛类混合物可降低收缩趋势。一些收缩空间伪像可能很容易被误解为正常特征。由于松果体通常含有退化结构,因此特别需要可靠的固定程序。此外,在评估生理变化时,准确的保存至关重要。

相似文献

3
Membrane alterations in cerebral cortex when using PIPES buffer.
J Neurocytol. 1986 Aug;15(4):461-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01611729.
5
Osmolar concentration and fixation of mycoplasmas.支原体的渗透压浓度与固定
J Bacteriol. 1972 Jun;110(3):1154-62. doi: 10.1128/jb.110.3.1154-1162.1972.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验