Boal Ashley L, Abroms Lorien C, Simmens Samuel, Graham Amanda L, Carpenter Kelly M
Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC;
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC;
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1046-53. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv249. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
This study seeks to determine whether comprehensive quitline services combined with text messaging improve smoking cessation rates beyond those achieved by offering comprehensive quitline services alone.
The study sample consisted of callers to the Alere Wellbeing, Inc, commercial quitline in 2012. A quasi-experimental design was implemented using propensity score matching to create the intervention and control groups. The intervention group consisted of those who were offered and accepted a text message intervention in addition to usual quitline services, while the control group consisted of those who were not offered the text message intervention. Analyses utilized baseline data collected at intake, program use data (eg, call history and text message use), and reports of smoking behaviors and program satisfaction collected 6 months after intake.
Similar rates of 7-day abstinence were reported regardless of whether participants received combined multi-call quitline services plus text messaging (25.3%) or multi-call quitline services in isolation (25.5%), though those who received combined services reported higher treatment satisfaction (P < .05). Among those who received combined services, the number of text messages sent to the text message program predicted 7-day abstinence such that those who sent more text messages were less likely to report 7-day abstinence.
Text messaging may not confer additional benefits over and above those received through multi-modal, multi-call quitline programs. Future research should investigate whether text messaging programs improve quit rates when combined with less intensive services such as single-call phone counseling.
While the impact of quitline and text messaging services for smoking cessation have been examined in isolation, no study has explored the impact of combined services on smoking outcomes. This study examines the role of text messaging in combination with comprehensive quitline services including multi-call phone counseling, access to an interactive website and nicotine replacement therapy.
本研究旨在确定综合戒烟热线服务与短信相结合是否能提高戒烟率,使其高于仅提供综合戒烟热线服务所达到的戒烟率。
研究样本包括2012年拨打Alere Wellbeing公司商业戒烟热线的来电者。采用倾向得分匹配的准实验设计来创建干预组和对照组。干预组由那些除了接受常规戒烟热线服务外还接受并使用短信干预的人组成,而对照组由那些未接受短信干预的人组成。分析使用了在入组时收集的基线数据、项目使用数据(如通话记录和短信使用情况)以及入组6个月后收集的吸烟行为报告和项目满意度报告。
无论参与者是接受了多轮戒烟热线服务加短信的组合服务(25.3%)还是仅接受多轮戒烟热线服务(25.5%),报告的7天戒烟率相似,不过接受组合服务的人报告的治疗满意度更高(P <.05)。在接受组合服务的人中,发送到短信项目的短信数量可预测7天戒烟情况,即发送短信较多的人报告7天戒烟的可能性较小。
短信可能不会带来超出多模式、多轮戒烟热线项目的额外益处。未来的研究应调查短信项目与单轮电话咨询等强度较低的服务相结合时是否能提高戒烟率。
虽然已分别研究了戒烟热线和短信服务对戒烟的影响,但尚无研究探讨组合服务对吸烟结果的影响。本研究考察了短信与综合戒烟热线服务(包括多轮电话咨询、访问互动网站和尼古丁替代疗法)相结合的作用。