Doll Jacob A, Hellkamp Anne, Thomas Laine, Ho P Michael, Kontos Michael C, Whooley Mary A, Boyden Thomas F, Peterson Eric D, Wang Tracy Y
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):855-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
Guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction, yet little is known about the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on medication adherence and clinical outcomes among contemporary older adults. The optimal number of cardiac rehabilitation sessions is not clear.
We linked patients 65years or older enrolled in the Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines (ACTION Registry-GWTG) from January 2007 to December 2010 to Medicare longitudinal claims data to obtain 1 year follow-up.
A total of 11,862 patients participated in cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction, attending a median number of 26 sessions. Patients attending ≥26 sessions were more likely to be male, had lesser prevalence of comorbid conditions and prior revascularization, and were more likely to present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, compared with patients attending 1 to 25 sessions. Among patients with Medicare Part D prescription coverage, increasing number of cardiac rehabilitation sessions was associated with improvement in adherence to secondary prevention medications such as P2Y12 inhibitors and β-blockers. Each 5-session increase in participation was associated with lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92) and lower overall risk of major adverse cardiac event (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) and death/readmission (adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.83).
In this older patient population, number of cardiac rehabilitation sessions attended was associated with improved medication adherence and lower downstream cardiovascular risk in a dose-response relationship. This provides support for the continued use of cardiac rehabilitation for older adults and encourages efforts to maximize attendance.
指南推荐急性心肌梗死后进行心脏康复,但对于当代老年人而言,心脏康复对药物依从性和临床结局的影响知之甚少。心脏康复的最佳疗程数尚不清楚。
我们将2007年1月至2010年12月纳入急性冠状动脉治疗干预结果网络注册研究-遵循指南(ACTION注册研究-GWTG)的65岁及以上患者与医疗保险纵向理赔数据相链接,以获得1年的随访结果。
共有11862例患者在急性心肌梗死后参加了心脏康复,平均疗程数为26次。与参加1至25次疗程的患者相比,参加≥26次疗程的患者更可能为男性,合并症和既往血运重建的患病率较低,且更可能表现为ST段抬高型心肌梗死。在有医疗保险D部分处方保险的患者中,心脏康复疗程数增加与P2Y12抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂等二级预防药物的依从性改善相关。每次参与疗程增加5次,死亡率降低(调整后风险比[HR]0.87,95%CI 0.83-0.92),主要不良心脏事件的总体风险降低(调整后HR 0.69,95%CI 0.65-0.73),死亡/再入院风险降低(调整后HR 0.79,95%CI 0.76-0.83)。
在这一老年患者群体中,参加心脏康复的疗程数与药物依从性改善及下游心血管风险降低呈剂量反应关系。这为继续对老年人使用心脏康复提供了支持,并鼓励努力使参与率最大化。