Teeuw Arianne Hélène, Hoytema van Konijnenburg Eva M, Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn Tessa, Molenaar Sjaak, Heymans Hugo S, van Rijn Rick R
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Emerg Nurs. 2016 Mar;42(2):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
To improve detection of child abuse and neglect (CAN), many emergency departments use screening methods. Apart from diagnostic accuracy, possible harms of screening methods are important to consider, especially because most children are not abused and do not benefit from screening. We performed a systematic literature review to assess parents' opinions about CAN screening, in which we could only include 7 studies, all reporting that the large majority of participating parents favor screening. Recently, a complete physical examination (called "top-toe" inspection [TTI], a fully undressed inspection of the child) was implemented as a CAN screening method at the emergency department of a teaching hospital in The Netherlands. This study describes parents' opinions about the TTI.
We used a questionnaire to assess parents' opinions about the TTI of their children when visiting the emergency department. During the study period, 1000 questionnaires were distributed by mail.
In total, 372 questionnaires were returned (37%). A TTI was performed for 194 children (52%). The overall attitude of parents whose children underwent a TTI was positive; 77.3% of the respondents found the TTI acceptable, and 1.5% (N = 3) found it unacceptable. Seventy percent of the respondents agreed with the theorem that all children who visit the emergency department should have a TTI performed, and 7.3% (N = 14) disagreed.
Contrary to what is commonly believed, both in our systematic literature review and in our questionnaire study, the majority of participating parents agree with screening for CAN in general and with the TTI specifically. Sharing the results of this study with ED personnel and policy makers could take away prejudices about perceived disagreement of parents, thereby improving implementation of and adherence to CAN screening.
为了提高对儿童虐待和忽视(CAN)的检测率,许多急诊科采用了筛查方法。除了诊断准确性外,筛查方法可能带来的危害也很重要,尤其是因为大多数儿童并未遭受虐待,无法从筛查中受益。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以评估家长对CAN筛查的看法,其中我们仅纳入了7项研究,所有研究均报告称,绝大多数参与研究的家长赞成筛查。最近,在荷兰一家教学医院的急诊科,一项全面的体格检查(称为“从头到脚”检查[TTI],即对儿童进行全身脱光检查)被用作CAN筛查方法。本研究描述了家长对TTI的看法。
我们使用问卷来评估家长在带孩子前往急诊科时对TTI的看法。在研究期间,通过邮件发放了1000份问卷。
共收回372份问卷(37%)。对194名儿童(52%)进行了TTI检查。接受TTI检查的儿童家长总体态度积极;77.3%的受访者认为TTI可以接受,1.5%(N = 3)认为不可接受。70%的受访者同意所有前往急诊科的儿童都应接受TTI检查这一观点,7.3%(N = 14)不同意。
与普遍看法相反,无论是在我们的系统文献综述还是在问卷调查研究中,大多数参与研究的家长总体上同意CAN筛查,特别是同意TTI检查。与急诊科工作人员和政策制定者分享本研究结果,可以消除对家长存在分歧看法的偏见,从而改进CAN筛查的实施和依从性。