Krol Marieke, Attema Arthur E, van Exel Job, Brouwer Werner
Institute of Health Policy & Management (MK, AEA, JVE, WB) Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (MK)
Med Decis Making. 2016 Feb;36(2):187-98. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15615870. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
Whether respondents incorporate altruistic preferences in time tradeoff (TTO) exercises remains understudied. We present an extended quality-adjusted life-year model incorporating altruism. We derive that altruism may affect TTO values in 2 directions. First, "longevity altruists" may wish to prolong life for the sake of their loved ones (to avoid being missed). Second, "quality-of-life altruists" may have a preference to avoid bad health states resulting in being a burden to loved ones. The existence and influence of these preferences in a TTO were empirically confirmed in a sample of 1690 respondents from the general public. We classified respondents as "longevity altruists" or "quality-of-life altruists" based on their reasoning behind inclusion of loved ones in their TTO responses. In line with expectations, longevity altruists traded fewer years than quality-of-life altruists. Nonaltruists gave intermediate values.
受访者是否在时间权衡(TTO)练习中纳入利他偏好仍未得到充分研究。我们提出了一个纳入利他主义的扩展质量调整生命年模型。我们得出利他主义可能在两个方向上影响TTO值。首先,“长寿利他主义者”可能希望为了他们所爱的人延长生命(以避免被思念)。其次,“生活质量利他主义者”可能倾向于避免健康状况不佳,以免成为亲人的负担。在1690名普通公众的样本中,这些偏好在TTO中的存在和影响得到了实证证实。我们根据受访者在TTO回答中纳入亲人的背后原因,将他们分类为“长寿利他主义者”或“生活质量利他主义者”。与预期一致,长寿利他主义者权衡的年数比生活质量利他主义者少。非利他主义者给出的是中间值。