Yousefi Hadi, Chopra Arvind, Farrokhseresht Rez, Sarmukaddam Sanjeev, Noghabi Fariba Asadi, Bedekar Nilima, Madani Abdolhosain
Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Savitribi Phule Pune University, Pune, India.
Epidemiol Health. 2015 Nov 5;37:e2015048. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2015048. eCollection 2015.
Epidemiology has taken on new roles in the management of health care services. In this study, we developed a non-pharmacological self-management modular program group intervention and evaluated its efficacy as an adjunct therapy in patients suffering from early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Patients were randomized to either participate in a non-equivalent intervention group along with the standard of care or only receive standard-of-care treatment at a community rheumatology center. The outcomes measured were a pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient general health (GH) on a VAS, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 scale measuring quality of life. These parameters were evaluated in the first week to obtain baseline values, and at 20, 32, 48, and 60 weeks to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention group.
The patients were randomized, with 100 patients in the intervention group and 106 in the control group. The intervention and control groups were similar with regard to the percentage of women (86% vs. 89.6%), tobacco usage (25% vs. 19.8%), mean age (42.6±13.2 years vs. 46.6±10.9 years), and disease duration (15.3±6.7 months vs. 14.5±6.6 months). The mean outcomes were significantly different between the two groups, and post-hoc pairwise analysis demonstrated significant deterioration in the control group in contrast to improvement in the intervention group at the second, third, fourth, and fifth evaluations. Improvements were often seen as early as the 12-week and 24-week follow-up visits.
Epidemiology contributes to the evaluation of how well specific therapies or other health interventions prevent or control health problems. The modular program group intervention implemented in this study appears to be a suitable and feasible method to facilitate much more comprehensive management of early RA in socioeconomically challenged communities.
流行病学在医疗服务管理中发挥了新作用。在本研究中,我们制定了一个非药物自我管理模块化项目组干预措施,并评估其作为早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者辅助治疗的疗效。
患者被随机分配至接受与标准治疗相结合的非等效干预组,或仅在社区风湿病中心接受标准治疗。测量的结果包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、VAS上的患者总体健康状况(GH)以及测量生活质量的简明健康调查问卷第2版量表。在第一周评估这些参数以获得基线值,并在第20、32、48和60周评估干预组的疗效。
患者被随机分组,干预组100例,对照组106例。干预组和对照组在女性比例(86%对89.6%)、吸烟率(25%对19.8%)、平均年龄(42.6±13.2岁对46.6±10.9岁)和病程(15.3±6.7个月对14.5±6.6个月)方面相似。两组的平均结果有显著差异,事后成对分析表明,与干预组在第二次、第三次、第四次和第五次评估中的改善相比,对照组出现了显著恶化。改善通常早在12周和24周的随访中就已出现。
流行病学有助于评估特定疗法或其他健康干预措施预防或控制健康问题的效果。本研究中实施的模块化项目组干预措施似乎是在社会经济条件较差的社区促进早期RA更全面管理的一种合适且可行的方法。