O'Byrne Michael L, Gillespie Matthew J, Shinohara Russell T, Dori Yoav, Rome Jonathan J, Glatz Andrew C
Division of Cardiology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington School of Medicine, Washington, D.C..
Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;117(1):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
Outcomes for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TC-PVR) and operative pulmonary valve replacement (S-PVR) are excellent. Thus, their respective cost is a relevant clinical outcome. We performed a retrospective cohort study of children and adults who underwent PVR at age ≥ 8 years from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, at 35 centers contributing data to the Pediatric Health Information Systems database to address this question. A propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis was performed to adjust for known confounders. Secondary analyses of department-level charges, risk of re-admission, and associated costs were performed. A total of 2,108 PVR procedures were performed in 2,096 subjects (14% transcatheter and 86% operative). The observed cost of S-PVR and TC-PVR was not significantly different (2013US $50,030 vs 2013US $51,297; p = 0.85). In multivariate analysis, total costs of S-PVR and TC-PVR were not significantly different (p = 0.52). Length of stay was shorter after TC-PVR (p <0.0001). Clinical and supply charges were greater for TC-PVR (p <0.0001), whereas laboratory, pharmacy, and other charges (all p <0.0001) were greater for S-PVR. Risks of both 7- and 30-day readmission were not significantly different. In conclusion, short-term costs of TC-PVR and S-PVR are not significantly different after adjustment.
经导管肺动脉瓣置换术(TC-PVR)和外科肺动脉瓣置换术(S-PVR)的治疗效果都非常好。因此,它们各自的成本便成为了一项相关的临床结果。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2011年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间在35个向儿科健康信息系统数据库提供数据的中心接受年龄≥8岁的肺动脉瓣置换术的儿童和成人,以解决这个问题。我们进行了倾向评分调整的多变量分析,以调整已知的混杂因素。我们还对科室层面的费用、再次入院风险及相关成本进行了二次分析。共有2096名受试者接受了2108例肺动脉瓣置换术(14%为经导管置换,86%为外科手术置换)。观察到的S-PVR和TC-PVR成本无显著差异(2013年美元50,030 对比2013年美元51,297;p = 0.85)。在多变量分析中,S-PVR和TC-PVR的总成本无显著差异(p = 0.52)。TC-PVR后的住院时间较短(p <0.0001)。TC-PVR的临床和耗材费用更高(p <0.0001),而S-PVR的实验室、药房及其他费用更高(所有p <0.0001)。7天和30天再次入院风险无显著差异。总之,调整后TC-PVR和S-PVR的短期成本无显著差异。