Starodubtsev Vladimir, Karpenko Andrey, Ignatenko Pavel
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Budget Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, Ministry for Public Health Care Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, Russia -
Int Angiol. 2016 Oct;35(5):484-91. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
The purpose of our study was to compare immediate and long-term results of hybrid repair and open aortofemoral reconstructions in the patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society (TASC) II Type C and Type D iliac lesions in combination with the concomitant lesion of common femoral artery (CFA).
We have included in this prospective case-controlled study 112 patients with extensive iliac and CFA occlusive disease. The study was conducted from 2009 till 2014. In the first group there were 46 patients who received recanalization and stenting of iliac arteries in combination with endarterectomy and angioplasty of common femoral and deep femoral arteries. In the second group there were 66 patients who received aortofemoral bypass. All patients had chronic ischemia (Stage 3-5, Rutherford classification) for TransAtlantic Inter-Society (TASC II) type C and D iliac occlusive disease.
We have not found any significant differences in demographic details between the groups. At the same time there were significant differences in clinical data (coronary heart disease and stage of chronic ischemia) between the groups. Early (<30 days) thrombosis of the stented iliac segment or aorto-femoral bypass was detected in three patients (6.5%) in the first group and three cases (4.5%) in the second group. Thrombectomies using a Fogarty catheter were successful performed in both groups. The average length of the follow-up was 3.1 years (in the range of 6 to 48 months), with a mean follow-up of 3.3 years for the open repair (range 6-48 months) and 2.8 years for the hybrid repair (range 6-48 months) group. At the end of the follow-up period, thrombosis of the stented iliac segment or aortofemoral bypass was detected in 5 (10.9%) patients of the 1st group and 5 (7.8%) patients of the 2nd group. The cumulative primary patency rates at 12, 24 and 36 months were 95.7%, 90.8%, 84.3% in the 1st group and 98.5%, 95.4%, 90.4% in the 2nd group, respectively (P=0.84). The limb salvage rates in our study at 12 and 24 months were 97.8% and 93.8% in the 1st group and 100% and 98% in the 2nd group, respectively (P=0.23).
Hybrid surgery including recanalization and stenting of iliac artery in combination with endarterectomy and angioplasty of common femoral and deep femoral arteries is an effective (at least in the mid-term period) minimally invasive treatment for patients with multifocal peripheral artery disease. This single-center study supports the safety and durable efficacy of hybrid procedures in a limited cohort of patients, thus emphasizing the need for larger scale clinical trials to evaluate this approach against aortofemoral bypass.
我们研究的目的是比较杂交修复术与开放性主-股动脉重建术治疗跨大西洋两岸血管外科学会(TASC)II C型和D型髂动脉病变合并股总动脉(CFA)病变的下肢外周动脉疾病患者的近期和远期结果。
我们将112例患有广泛髂动脉和CFA闭塞性疾病的患者纳入这项前瞻性病例对照研究。该研究于2009年至2014年进行。第一组有46例患者接受了髂动脉再通和支架置入术,同时行股总动脉和股深动脉内膜切除术及血管成形术。第二组有66例患者接受了主-股动脉旁路移植术。所有患者均患有慢性缺血(根据卢瑟福分类为3 - 5期),属于TASC II C型和D型髂动脉闭塞性疾病。
我们未发现两组患者在人口统计学细节上有任何显著差异。同时,两组患者在临床数据(冠心病和慢性缺血阶段)上存在显著差异。第一组有3例患者(6.5%)出现支架置入的髂动脉段或主-股动脉旁路移植术早期(<30天)血栓形成,第二组有3例患者(4.5%)出现。两组均成功使用Fogarty导管进行了血栓切除术。平均随访时间为3.1年(6至48个月),开放修复组平均随访3.3年(6至48个月),杂交修复组平均随访2.8年(6至48个月)。随访期末,第一组有5例患者(10.9%)出现支架置入的髂动脉段或主-股动脉旁路移植术血栓形成,第二组有5例患者(7.8%)出现。第一组在12、24和36个月时的累计原发性通畅率分别为95.7%、90.8%、84.3%,第二组分别为9&5%、95.4%、90.4%(P = 0.84)。我们研究中第一组在12个月和24个月时的肢体挽救率分别为97.8%和93.8%,第二组分别为100%和98%(P = 0.23)。
包括髂动脉再通和支架置入术,同时行股总动脉和股深动脉内膜切除术及血管成形术的杂交手术是治疗多灶性外周动脉疾病患者的一种有效(至少在中期)微创治疗方法。这项单中心研究支持了杂交手术在有限患者队列中的安全性和持久疗效,因此强调需要进行更大规模的临床试验来评估这种方法与主-股动脉旁路移植术的对比效果。