Schultheis Anne M, Martelotto Luciano G, De Filippo Maria R, Piscuglio Salvatore, Ng Charlotte K Y, Hussein Yaser R, Reis-Filho Jorge S, Soslow Robert A, Weigelt Britta
Department of Pathology (A.M.S., L.G.M., M.R.D.F., S.P., C.K.Y.N., Y.R.H., J.S.R.-F., R.A.S., B.W.) Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program (J.S.R.-F.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2016 Jul;35(4):289-300. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000243.
Endometrial carcinomas (ECs) are heterogeneous at the genetic level. Although TP53 mutations are highly recurrent in serous endometrial carcinomas (SECs), these are also present in a subset of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs). Here, we sought to define the frequency, pattern, distribution, and type of TP53 somatic mutations in ECs by performing a reanalysis of the publicly available data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A total of 228 EECs (n=186) and SECs (n=42) from the TCGA data set, for which an integrated genomic characterization was performed, were interrogated for the presence and type of TP53 mutations, and for mutations in genes frequently mutated in ECs. TP53 mutations were found in 15% of EECs and 88% of SECs, and in 91% of copy-number-high and 35% of polymerase (DNA directed), epsilon, catalytic subunit (POLE) integrative genomic subtypes. In addition to differences in prevalence, variations in the type and pattern of TP53 mutations were observed between histologic types and between integrative genomic subtypes. TP53 hotspot mutations were significantly more frequently found in SECs (46%) than in EECs (15%). TP53-mutant EECs significantly more frequently harbored a co-occurring PTEN mutation than TP53-mutant SECs. Finally, a subset of TP53-mutant ECs (22%) was found to harbor frameshift or nonsense mutations. Given that nonsense and frameshift TP53 mutations result in distinct p53 immunohistochemical results that require careful interpretation, and that EECs and SECs display different patterns, types, and distributions of TP53 mutations, the use of the TP53/p53 status alone for the differential diagnosis of EECs and SECs may not be sufficient.
子宫内膜癌(ECs)在基因水平上具有异质性。尽管TP53突变在浆液性子宫内膜癌(SECs)中高度频发,但在一部分子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌(EECs)中也存在。在此,我们通过对来自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)的公开数据进行重新分析,试图确定ECs中TP53体细胞突变的频率、模式、分布及类型。对TCGA数据集中总共228例已进行综合基因组特征分析的EECs(n = 186)和SECs(n = 42),检测其TP53突变的存在及类型,以及ECs中常见突变基因的突变情况。在15%的EECs和88%的SECs中发现了TP53突变,在91%的高拷贝数和35%的聚合酶(DNA定向)ε催化亚基(POLE)综合基因组亚型中也发现了TP53突变。除了在患病率上存在差异外,在组织学类型之间以及综合基因组亚型之间还观察到TP53突变类型和模式的变化。TP53热点突变在SECs(46%)中比在EECs(15%)中更频繁地被发现。TP53突变的EECs比TP53突变的SECs更频繁地同时存在PTEN突变。最后,发现一部分TP53突变的ECs(22%)存在移码或无义突变。鉴于无义和移码TP53突变会导致不同的p53免疫组化结果,需要仔细解读,并且EECs和SECs表现出不同的TP53突变模式、类型和分布,仅使用TP53/p53状态来鉴别诊断EECs和SECs可能并不充分。