Schaefer Markus K, Hechavarría Julio C, Kössl Manfred
Institute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, AK Neurobiology and Biosensors, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Front Neural Circuits. 2015 Oct 2;9:52. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2015.00052. eCollection 2015.
Current source density (CSD) analysis assesses spatiotemporal synaptic activations at somatic and/or dendritic levels in the form of depolarizing current sinks. Whereas many studies have focused on the short (<50 ms) latency sinks, associated with thalamocortical projections, sinks with longer latencies have received less attention. Here, we analyzed laminar CSD patterns for the first 600 ms after stimulus onset in the primary auditory cortex of Mongolian gerbils. By applying an algorithm for contour calculation, three distinct mid and four late evoked sinks were identified in layers I, III, Va, VIa, and VIb. Our results further showed that the patterns of intracortical information-flow remained qualitatively similar for low and for high sound pressure level stimuli at the characteristic frequency (CF) as well as for stimuli ± 1 octave from CF. There were, however, differences associated with the strength, vertical extent, onset latency, and duration of the sinks for the four stimulation paradigms used. Stimuli one octave above the most sensitive frequency evoked a new, and quite reliable, sink in layer Va whereas low level stimulation led to the disappearance of the layer VIb sink. These data indicate the presence of input sources specifically activated in response to level and/or frequency parameters. Furthermore, spectral integration above vs. below the CF of neurons is asymmetric as illustrated by CSD profiles. These results are important because synaptic feedback associated with mid and late sinks-beginning at 50 ms post stimulus latency-is likely crucial for response modulation resulting from higher order processes like memory, learning or cognitive control.
电流源密度(CSD)分析以去极化电流汇的形式评估体细胞和/或树突水平的时空突触激活。尽管许多研究集中在与丘脑皮质投射相关的短潜伏期(<50毫秒)电流汇,但对较长潜伏期电流汇的关注较少。在这里,我们分析了蒙古沙鼠初级听觉皮层刺激开始后最初600毫秒的层状CSD模式。通过应用一种轮廓计算算法,在I、III、Va、VIa和VIb层中识别出三个不同的中期和四个晚期诱发电流汇。我们的结果进一步表明,在特征频率(CF)下,低和高声压级刺激以及CF上下±1倍频程刺激的皮质内信息流模式在质量上保持相似。然而,对于所使用的四种刺激范式,电流汇的强度、垂直范围、起始潜伏期和持续时间存在差异。比最敏感频率高一个倍频程的刺激在Va层诱发了一个新的且相当可靠的电流汇,而低水平刺激导致VIb层电流汇消失。这些数据表明存在响应水平和/或频率参数而特异性激活的输入源。此外,如CSD剖面图所示,神经元CF以上与以下的频谱整合是不对称的。这些结果很重要,因为与中期和晚期电流汇相关的突触反馈(从刺激潜伏期50毫秒开始)可能对由记忆、学习或认知控制等高阶过程产生的反应调制至关重要。