Kim Beom Seok, Lee Yong Kyu, Choi Hoon Young, Choi Seung Ok, Shin Sug Kyun, Ha Sung Kyu, Lee Kang Wook, Kim Yang Wook, Kim Yong Lim, Yasuda Yoshinari, Imai Enyu, Horio Masaru, Tomino Yasuhiko, Matsuo Seiichi, Lee Ho Yung
Department of Nephrology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, National Health Institute Corporation, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Geonggido, Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju Christian Hospital, Wonju, Kangwon, Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Nephrology Division Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Hospital, Busan, Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea, Department of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Nakayamadera Imai Clinic, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Department of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, and Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Nephrol. 2015 Dec;84(6):331-8. doi: 10.5414/CN108496.
Recently, a new glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equation for the Japanese population was proposed using measured inulin clearance. To expand its applicability to other Asian populations, we performed a comparative study in the Korean population. Inulin clearance was measured in 166 patients from seven participating medical centers in Korea. Patient's sera and urine were collected, and baseline clinical characteristics were measured to provide an estimated GFR (eGFR) by the Japanese GFR equation using inulin clearance (Japanese-GFR equation), the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation, and the Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. We compared the results to determine which equation best estimated the measured GFR (mGFR). Accuracy (95% CI) within 30% of mGFR by the Japanese-GFR equation, the CKD-EPI equation and the MDRD study equation were 66 (58 - 72), 51 (43 - 58), and 55 (47 - 62)%, respectively. Bias (mGFR minus eGFR) were 3.4 ± 22.4, -12.0 ± 22.1, and -9.7 ± 23.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The accuracy of the Japanese-GFR equation was significantly better than MDRD study equation in subjects with mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and in total subjects. The bias of the Japanese-GFR equation was significantly smaller compared with other two equations in total subjects. The Japanese-GFR equation has a higher accuracy with less bias than the other equations in estimating GFR in Korean populations. Further studies are required to determine if the current Japanese-GFR equation could represent the standard eGFR for other Asian populations.
最近,利用实测菊粉清除率提出了一种适用于日本人群的新的肾小球滤过率(GFR)方程。为了扩大其在其他亚洲人群中的适用性,我们在韩国人群中进行了一项比较研究。对来自韩国7个参与研究的医疗中心的166例患者测量了菊粉清除率。收集患者的血清和尿液,并测量基线临床特征,以便通过使用菊粉清除率的日本GFR方程(日本-GFR方程)、肾脏病膳食改良(MDRD)研究方程和慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)方程来提供估计的GFR(eGFR)。我们比较了结果,以确定哪个方程能最好地估计实测GFR(mGFR)。日本-GFR方程、CKD-EPI方程和MDRD研究方程在mGFR的30%范围内的准确性(95%CI)分别为66(58 - 72)%、51(43 - 58)%和55(47 - 62)%。偏差(mGFR减去eGFR)分别为3.4±22.4、-12.0±22.1和-9.7±23.8 mL/min/1.73 m²。在mGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m²的受试者和所有受试者中,日本-GFR方程的准确性显著优于MDRD研究方程。在所有受试者中,日本-GFR方程的偏差与其他两个方程相比显著更小。在估计韩国人群的GFR方面,日本-GFR方程比其他方程具有更高的准确性和更小的偏差。需要进一步研究以确定当前的日本-GFR方程是否可代表其他亚洲人群的标准eGFR。