Suppr超能文献

慢性卒中患者高强度力量训练中弹力抗阻训练与器械训练的肌电图比较

Electromyographic Comparison of Elastic Resistance and Machine Exercises for High-Intensity Strength Training in Patients With Chronic Stroke.

作者信息

Vinstrup Jonas, Calatayud Joaquin, Jakobsen Markus D, Sundstrup Emil, Jay Kenneth, Brandt Mikkel, Zeeman Peter, Jørgensen Jørgen R, Andersen Lars L

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; Prevention Health Exercise and Sport Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Mar;97(3):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.099. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether elastic resistance training can induce comparable levels of muscle activity as conventional machine training in patients with chronic stroke.

DESIGN

Comparative study.

SETTING

Outpatient rehabilitation facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Stroke patients (N=18) with hemiparesis (mean age, 57 ± 8y).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients performed 3 consecutive repetitions at 10 repetition maximum of unilateral knee extension and flexion using elastic resistance and conventional machine training.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Surface electromyography was measured in vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus and was normalized to maximal electromyography (% of max) of the nonparetic leg.

RESULTS

In the paretic leg, agonist muscle activity ranged from 18% to 24% normalized electromyography (% of max) (nEMG) during knee flexion and from 32% to 40% nEMG during knee extension. For knee extension, vastus lateralis nEMG was higher during machine exercise than during elastic resistance exercise (40% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 33-47] vs 32% [95% CI, 25-39]; P=.003). In the nonparetic leg, agonist muscle activity ranged from 54% to 61% during knee flexion and from 52% to 68% during knee extension. For knee flexion semitendinosus nEMG was higher (61% [95% CI, 50-71] vs 54% [95% CI, 44-64]; P=.016) and for knee extension vastus medialis nEMG was higher (68% [95% CI, 60-76] vs 56% [95% CI, 48-64]; P<.001) during machine exercise than during elastic resistance exercise. By contrast, antagonist coactivation was significantly higher during knee flexion when performed using elastic resistance compared with the machine. Lastly, there were no differences in perceived exertion between exercise modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine training appears to induce slightly higher levels of muscle activity in some of the investigated muscles compared to elastic resistance during lower limb strength training in patients with chronic stroke. The higher level of coactivation during knee flexion when performed using elastic resistance suggests that elastic resistance exercises are more difficult to perform. This is likely due to a higher level of movement instability.

摘要

目的

探讨在慢性卒中患者中,弹性阻力训练能否诱发与传统器械训练相当的肌肉活动水平。

设计

比较研究。

地点

门诊康复机构。

参与者

18例偏瘫(平均年龄57±8岁)的卒中患者。

干预措施

患者使用弹性阻力和传统器械训练,以10次重复最大值进行连续3次单侧膝关节屈伸练习。

主要观察指标

测量股外侧肌、股内侧肌、股二头肌和半腱肌的表面肌电图,并将其标准化为非患侧腿最大肌电图(最大肌电图的百分比)。

结果

在患侧腿中,膝关节屈曲时,主动肌肌肉活动的标准化肌电图(最大肌电图的百分比)范围为18%至24%,膝关节伸展时为32%至40%。对于膝关节伸展,器械训练期间股外侧肌的标准化肌电图高于弹性阻力训练期间(40%[95%置信区间{CI},33 - 47]对32%[95%CI,25 - 39];P = 0.003)。在非患侧腿中,膝关节屈曲时主动肌肌肉活动范围为54%至61%,膝关节伸展时为52%至68%。对于膝关节屈曲,器械训练期间半腱肌的标准化肌电图更高(61%[95%CI,50 - 71]对54%[95%CI,44 - 64];P = 0.016),对于膝关节伸展,器械训练期间股内侧肌的标准化肌电图更高(68%[95%CI,60 - 76]对56%[95%CI,48 - 64];P < 0.001)。相比之下,与器械训练相比,使用弹性阻力进行膝关节屈曲时,拮抗肌的共同激活明显更高。最后,两种运动方式之间的主观用力程度没有差异。

结论

在慢性卒中患者的下肢力量训练中,与弹性阻力训练相比,器械训练似乎能在一些被研究的肌肉中诱发略高的肌肉活动水平。使用弹性阻力进行膝关节屈曲时更高水平的共同激活表明弹性阻力运动更难进行。这可能是由于更高水平的运动不稳定性所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验