Schreyer Colleen C, Coughlin Janelle W, Makhzoumi Saniha H, Redgrave Graham W, Hansen Jennifer L, Guarda Angela S
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Meyer 101, Baltimore, Maryland, 21287.
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Catonsville, Maryland, 21250.
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Apr;49(4):407-12. doi: 10.1002/eat.22476. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
The use of coercion in the treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) is controversial and the limited studies to date have focused on involuntary treatment. However, coercive pressure for treatment that does not include legal measures is common in voluntarily admitted patients with AN. Empirical data examining the effect of non-legal forms of coerced care on hospital outcomes are needed.
Participants (N = 202) with AN, Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID), or subthreshold AN admitted to a hospital-based behavioral specialty program completed questionnaires assessing illness severity and perceived coercion around the admissions process. Hospital course variables included inpatient length of stay, successful transition to a step-down partial hospitalization program, and achievement of target weight prior to program discharge.
Higher perceived coercion at admission was associated with increased drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction, but not with admission BMI. Perceived coercion was not related to inpatient length of stay, rate of weight gain, or achievement of target weight although it was predictive of premature drop-out prior to transition to an integrated partial hospitalization program.
These results, from an adequately powered sample, demonstrate that perceived coercion at admission to a hospital-based behavioral treatment program was not associated with rate of inpatient weight gain or achieving weight restoration, suggesting that coercive pressure to enter treatment does not necessarily undermine formation of a therapeutic alliance or clinical progress. Future studies should examine perceived coercion and long-term outcomes, patient views on coercive pressures, and the effect of different forms of leveraged treatment.
在神经性厌食症(AN)治疗中使用强制手段存在争议,且迄今为止有限的研究集中在非自愿治疗上。然而,在自愿入院的AN患者中,不包括法律措施的治疗强制压力很常见。需要实证数据来检验非法律形式的强制护理对医院治疗结果的影响。
患有AN、回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)或阈下AN并入住一家基于医院的行为专科项目的参与者(N = 202)完成了问卷,评估疾病严重程度以及在入院过程中感受到的强制程度。医院病程变量包括住院时间、成功过渡到逐步减少的部分住院项目,以及在项目出院前达到目标体重。
入院时较高的强制感与对瘦身的更强驱动力和身体不满增加有关,但与入院时的体重指数无关。强制感与住院时间、体重增加率或目标体重的达成无关,尽管它可预测在过渡到综合部分住院项目之前的提前退出。
这些来自样本量充足的研究结果表明,在基于医院的行为治疗项目入院时感受到的强制与住院体重增加率或体重恢复无关,这表明进入治疗的强制压力不一定会破坏治疗联盟的形成或临床进展。未来的研究应考察强制感和长期结果、患者对强制压力的看法,以及不同形式的杠杆治疗的效果。