Guner Levent A, Caliskan Billur, Isik Ilknur, Aksoy Tamer, Vardareli Erkan, Parspur Afsin
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
J Nucl Med Technol. 2015 Dec;43(4):282-8. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.115.165936. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
Attenuation artifacts reduce our ability to evaluate perfusion of affected myocardial segments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of routine prone-position image evaluation within a stepwise visual interpretation of myocardial perfusion studies.
We have included 279 consecutive patients who were referred for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. All patients underwent routine electrocardiogram-gated supine SPECT imaging and non-electrocardiogram-gated prone-position SPECT imaging. Three nuclear medicine physicians interpreted the images in the following order: polar maps, supine images, raw images, motion-frozen gated images, and prone images, using a scale of 0-4. Segments with perfusion abnormalities were noted.
All physicians reported lower proportions of equivocal evaluations after evaluating prone images (18.3% vs. 4.7%, 19% vs. 11.1%, and 12.2% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0077, and P = 0.0125, respectively). At the prone stage, normalcy rates were 89%, 87%, and 91%. Two physicians had significantly increased normalcy rates at the prone stage (72%-89%, P = 0.039, and 66%-87%, P = 0.006). At the prone stage, a decision reversal to normal or probably normal was observed in 40% (29/72), 33% (17/51), and 43% (21/48). In men, apical, mid, and basal inferior walls and in women apical and mid parts of anterior walls were more likely to be attributed to attenuation. The 2 steps that increased normalcy rates for interpreters were the review of raw images and of prone images.
Routine prone imaging increases interpretive certainty and interobserver agreement and changes the final evaluation in a substantial number of patients and significantly decreases the number of equivocal evaluations.
衰减伪影降低了我们评估受影响心肌节段灌注的能力。本研究的目的是在心肌灌注研究的逐步视觉解读中评估常规俯卧位图像评估的影响。
我们纳入了279例连续因心肌缺血评估而转诊的患者。所有患者均接受了常规心电图门控仰卧位SPECT成像和非心电图门控俯卧位SPECT成像。三位核医学医生按以下顺序解读图像:极坐标图、仰卧位图像、原始图像、运动冻结门控图像和俯卧位图像,采用0 - 4分制。记录有灌注异常的节段。
所有医生在评估俯卧位图像后报告的可疑评估比例均较低(分别为18.3%对4.7%、19%对11.1%、12.2%对6.1%,P < 0.0001、P = 0.0077、P = 0.0125)。在俯卧位阶段,正常率分别为89%、87%和91%。两位医生在俯卧位阶段的正常率显著提高(72% - 89%,P = 0.039;66% - 87%,P = 0.006)。在俯卧位阶段,40%(29/72)、33%(17/51)和43%(21/48)的病例出现了判断反转至正常或可能正常的情况。在男性中,心尖、中间和基底下壁,在女性中的心尖和前壁中间部分更可能归因于衰减。增加解读医生正常率的两个步骤是对原始图像和俯卧位图像的审查。
常规俯卧位成像提高了解读的确定性和观察者间的一致性,并在大量患者中改变了最终评估,显著减少了可疑评估的数量。