Mount Seth, Davis Darryl R
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada, K1Y 4W7.
J Physiol. 2016 May 1;594(9):2511-24. doi: 10.1113/JP270540. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
Despite advances in other realms of cardiac care, the mortality attributable to ischaemic cardiomyopathy has only marginally decreased over the last 10 years. These findings highlight the growing realization that current pharmacological and device therapies rarely reverse disease progression and rationalize a focus on novel means to reverse, repair and re-vascularize damaged hearts. As such, multiple candidate cell types have been used to regenerate damaged hearts either directly (through differentiation to form new tissue) or indirectly (via paracrine effects). Emerging literature suggests that robust engraftment of electrophysiolgically heterogeneous tissue from transplanted cells comes at the cost of a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. Similar electrophysiological studies of haematological stem cells raised early concerns that transplant of depolarized, inexcitable cells that also induce paracrine-mediated electrophysiological remodelling may be pro-arrhythmic. However, meta-analyses suggest that patients receiving haematological stem cells paradoxically may experience a decrease in ventricular arrhythmias, an observation potentially related to the extremely poor long-term survival of injected cells. Finally, early clinical and preclinical data from technologies capable of differentiating to a mature cardiomyocyte phenotype (such as cardiac-derived stem cells) suggests that these cells are not pro-arrhythmic although they too lack robust long-term engraftment. These results highlight the growing understanding that as next generation cell therapies are developed, emphasis should also be placed on understanding possible anti-arrhythmic contributions of transplanted cells while vigilance is needed to predict and treat the inadvertent effects of regenerative cell therapies on the electrophysiological stability of the ischaemic cardiomyopathic heart.
尽管在心脏护理的其他领域取得了进展,但在过去10年中,缺血性心肌病所致的死亡率仅略有下降。这些发现凸显了人们越来越认识到,当前的药物和器械治疗很少能逆转疾病进展,这也使得关注逆转、修复受损心脏并使其重新血管化的新方法变得合理。因此,多种候选细胞类型已被用于直接(通过分化形成新组织)或间接(通过旁分泌效应)再生受损心脏。新出现的文献表明,移植细胞中电生理异质性组织的强力植入是以室性心律失常的高发生率为代价的。对血液干细胞的类似电生理研究早期就引发了担忧,即移植去极化、无兴奋性的细胞,这些细胞还会诱导旁分泌介导的电生理重塑,可能会促心律失常。然而,荟萃分析表明,接受血液干细胞治疗的患者反常地可能经历室性心律失常的减少,这一观察结果可能与注入细胞极差的长期存活率有关。最后,来自能够分化为成熟心肌细胞表型的技术(如心脏来源的干细胞)的早期临床和临床前数据表明,这些细胞虽然也缺乏强力的长期植入,但不会促心律失常。这些结果凸显了人们越来越认识到,随着下一代细胞疗法的发展,在关注移植细胞可能的抗心律失常作用的同时,还需要警惕预测和治疗再生细胞疗法对缺血性心肌病心脏电生理稳定性的意外影响。