1Technology and Food Science Unit - Precision Livestock Farming,Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO),Burg. van Gansberghelaan 115 bus 1,9820 Merelbeke,Belgium.
2Department of Biosystems,Division Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBioS),Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,Kasteelpark Arenberg 30 bus 2456,3001 Heverlee,Belgium.
Animal. 2016 Sep;10(9):1533-41. doi: 10.1017/S175173111500244X. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
To tackle the high prevalence of lameness, techniques to monitor cow locomotion are being developed in order to detect changes in cows' locomotion due to lameness. Obviously, in such lameness detection systems, alerts should only respond to locomotion changes that are related to lameness. However, other environmental or cow factors can contribute to locomotion changes not related to lameness and hence, might cause false alerts. In this study the effects of wet surfaces, dark environment, age, production level, lactation and gestation stage on cow locomotion were investigated. Data was collected at Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research research farm (Melle, Belgium) during a 5-month period. The gait variables of 30 non-lame and healthy Holstein cows were automatically measured every day. In dark environments and on wet walking surfaces cows took shorter, more asymmetrical strides with less step overlap. In general, older cows had a more asymmetrical gait and they walked slower with more abduction. Lactation stage or gestation stage also showed significant association with asymmetrical and shorter gait and less step overlap probably due to the heavy calf in the uterus. Next, two lameness detection algorithms were developed to investigate the added value of environmental and cow data into detection models. One algorithm solely used locomotion variables and a second algorithm used the same locomotion variables and additional environmental and cow data. In the latter algorithm only age and lactation stage together with the locomotion variables were withheld during model building. When comparing the sensitivity for the detection of non-lame cows, sensitivity increased by 10% when the cow data was added in the algorithm (sensitivity was 70% and 80% for the first and second algorithm, respectively). Hence, the number of false alerts for lame cows that were actually non-lame, decreased. This pilot study shows that using knowledge on influencing factors on cow locomotion will help in reducing the number of false alerts for lameness detection systems under development. However, further research is necessary in order to better understand these and many other possible influencing factors (e.g. trimming, conformation) of non-lame and hence 'normal' locomotion in cows.
为了解决跛行高发的问题,人们正在开发监测奶牛运动的技术,以便检测由于跛行引起的奶牛运动变化。显然,在这种跛行检测系统中,警报应该只对与跛行相关的运动变化做出响应。然而,其他环境或奶牛因素也可能导致与跛行无关的运动变化,从而导致误报。在这项研究中,研究了湿表面、黑暗环境、年龄、生产水平、泌乳期和妊娠期对奶牛运动的影响。数据是在比利时农业和渔业研究所的研究农场(Melle)收集的,为期 5 个月。每天自动测量 30 头非跛足和健康荷斯坦奶牛的步态变量。在黑暗环境中和湿滑的行走表面上,奶牛的步幅更短、更不对称,步幅重叠更少。一般来说,年龄较大的奶牛步态更不对称,它们走得更慢,外展角度更大。泌乳期或妊娠期也与不对称和较短的步态以及较少的步幅重叠显著相关,这可能是由于子宫内的小牛较重。接下来,开发了两种跛行检测算法来研究环境和奶牛数据对检测模型的附加值。一种算法仅使用运动变量,另一种算法使用相同的运动变量和额外的环境和奶牛数据。在后一种算法中,仅在构建模型时保留年龄和泌乳期以及运动变量。在比较非跛足奶牛的检测灵敏度时,当将奶牛数据添加到算法中时,灵敏度提高了 10%(第一种和第二种算法的灵敏度分别为 70%和 80%)。因此,减少了对实际非跛足的跛足奶牛的误报数量。这项初步研究表明,利用关于奶牛运动影响因素的知识将有助于减少正在开发的跛行检测系统的误报数量。然而,为了更好地理解这些以及许多其他可能影响非跛足和因此“正常”奶牛运动的因素(例如修剪、 conformation),还需要进一步研究。