1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, People's Republic of China.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Feb;206(2):283-90. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15032. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of DWI in the N stage assessment of patients with lung cancer.
The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EBSCO English-language databases and two Chinese-language databases were searched for eligible studies. On the basis of the data extracted from included studies, we determined the pooled sensitivity and specificity, calculated the positive and negative likelihood ratios, and constructed summary ROC curves. In addition, we also performed threshold effect analysis, metaregression analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias analysis to explain the source of heterogeneity.
A total of 18 articles involving 1116 patients met the inclusion criteria. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates of DWI were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63-0.73) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94), respectively. On a per-lesion basis, the corresponding estimates were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) for sensitivity and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.96) for specificity. Only the analysis method (quantitative vs qualitative) affected the diagnostic accuracy on the basis of subgroup and metaregression analysis.
Current evidence suggests that DWI is beneficial in the nodal assessment of patients with lung cancer, and it is necessary to conduct high-quality prospective studies regarding the use of DWI in detecting metastatic lymph nodes of lung cancer to determine its true value.
本研究旨在评估 DWI 在肺癌患者 N 分期评估中的诊断性能。
检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 EBSCO 英文数据库以及中国两个中文数据库,以获取合格的研究。基于纳入研究中提取的数据,我们确定了汇总的敏感性和特异性,计算了阳性和阴性似然比,并构建了汇总 ROC 曲线。此外,我们还进行了阈值效应分析、荟萃回归分析、亚组分析和发表偏倚分析,以解释异质性的来源。
共有 18 篇文章涉及 1116 名患者符合纳入标准。基于每位患者,DWI 的汇总敏感性和特异性估计值分别为 0.68(95%CI,0.63-0.73)和 0.92(95%CI,0.90-0.94)。基于每例病变,相应的估计值为敏感性 0.72(95%CI,0.69-0.75)和特异性 0.96(95%CI,0.95-0.96)。仅基于亚组和荟萃回归分析,分析方法(定量与定性)会影响诊断准确性。
目前的证据表明,DWI 有助于肺癌患者的淋巴结评估,有必要开展高质量的前瞻性研究,以确定 DWI 在检测肺癌转移性淋巴结中的真正价值。