Suppr超能文献

围手术期输血并不影响肝癌根治性切除术后的无复发生存率和总生存率:倾向评分匹配分析。

Perioperative blood transfusion does not influence recurrence-free and overall survivals after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China; Liver Cancer Program, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York 10029, NY, USA.

Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2016 Mar;64(3):583-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Whether perioperative blood transfusions (PBTs) negatively impact oncologic outcomes after curative resection for HCC remains controversial. We aimed to identify the independent predictive factors of PBT for curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to investigate the impact of PBT on long-term recurrence and survivals after resection.

METHODS

Of 1103 patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC between 1999 and 2010, 285 (25.8%) patients received PBT. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive factors of PBT. Propensity scores and Cox regression analyses were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between patients who did and did not receive PBT.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analysis revealed that performance status, preoperative hemoglobin, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, tumor rupture, tumor size, macroscopic vascular invasion, and intraoperative blood loss were independent predictive factors of PBT for HCC resection. Propensity score matching analysis created 234 pairs of patients. Before propensity matching, PBT was significantly associated with increased risks of OS (HR: 2.455, 95% CI: 2.077-2.901, p<0.001) and RFS (HR: 2.018, 95% CI: 1.718-2.370, p<0.001) in the entire cohort. After propensity matching, PBT was not significantly associated with increased risks of OS (HR: 1.229, 95% CI: 0.988-1.527, p=0.063) and RFS (HR: 1.188, 95% CI: 0.960-1.469, p=0.113). After adjustment for other prognostic variables in the propensity matched cohort, PBT was still found not to be associated with OS and RFS after HCC resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study identified that PBT did not influence RFS and OS after curative resection of HCC.

摘要

背景与目的

关于根治性切除肝癌(HCC)后围手术期输血(PBT)是否对肿瘤学结果产生负面影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定 PBT 对 HCC 根治性切除的独立预测因素,并探讨 PBT 对术后长期复发和生存的影响。

方法

回顾性分析 1999 年至 2010 年间接受根治性肝切除术治疗 HCC 的 1103 例患者,其中 285 例(25.8%)患者接受了 PBT。采用单变量和多变量回归分析确定 PBT 的独立预测因素。采用倾向评分和 Cox 回归分析比较接受和未接受 PBT 的患者的总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。

结果

多变量回归分析显示,体能状态、术前血红蛋白、肝硬化、门静脉高压、肿瘤破裂、肿瘤大小、肉眼血管侵犯和术中出血量是 HCC 切除 PBT 的独立预测因素。采用倾向评分匹配分析创建了 234 对患者。在倾向评分匹配之前,PBT 与整个队列中 OS(HR:2.455,95%CI:2.077-2.901,p<0.001)和 RFS(HR:2.018,95%CI:1.718-2.370,p<0.001)风险增加显著相关。在倾向评分匹配后,PBT 与 OS(HR:1.229,95%CI:0.988-1.527,p=0.063)和 RFS(HR:1.188,95%CI:0.960-1.469,p=0.113)风险增加无关。在倾向匹配队列中调整其他预后变量后,仍发现 PBT 与 HCC 切除后的 OS 和 RFS 无关。

结论

本研究确定 PBT 不会影响 HCC 根治性切除后的 RFS 和 OS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验