Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Blood. 2016 Jan 28;127(4):496-502. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-655944. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
Septic transfusion reactions (STRs) resulting from transfusion of bacterially contaminated platelets are a major hazard of platelet transfusion despite recent interventions. Active and passive surveillance for bacterially contaminated platelets was performed over 7 years (2007-2013) by culture of platelet aliquots at time of transfusion and review of reported transfusion reactions. All platelet units had been cultured 24 hours after collection and released as negative. Five sets of STR criteria were evaluated, including recent AABB criteria; sensitivity and specificity of these criteria, as well as detection by active and passive surveillance, were determined. Twenty of 51,440 platelet units transfused (0.004%; 389 per million) were bacterially contaminated by active surveillance and resulted in 5 STRs occurring 9 to 24 hours posttransfusion; none of these STRs had been reported by passive surveillance. STR occurred only in neutropenic patients transfused with high bacterial loads. A total of 284 transfusion reactions (0.55%) were reported by passive surveillance. None of these patients had received contaminated platelets. However, 6 to 93 (2.1%-32.7%) of these 284 reactions met 1 or more STR criteria, and sensitivity of STR criteria varied from 5.1% to 45.5%. These results document the continued occurrence of bacterial contamination of platelets resulting in STR in neutropenic patients, failure of passive surveillance to detect STR, and lack of specificity of STR criteria. These findings highlight the limitations of reported national STR data based on passive surveillance and the need to implement further measures to address this problem such as secondary testing or use of pathogen reduction technologies.
尽管采取了最近的干预措施,但由于输注细菌污染的血小板而导致的脓毒性输血反应(STR)仍然是血小板输血的主要危害。在 7 年(2007-2013 年)的时间里,通过在输血时培养血小板的等分试样和回顾报告的输血反应,对细菌污染的血小板进行了主动和被动监测。所有血小板单位在采集后 24 小时均进行了培养且结果为阴性。评估了五套 STR 标准,包括最近的 AABB 标准;确定了这些标准的敏感性和特异性,以及通过主动和被动监测的检测结果。在 51440 个输注的血小板单位中(0.004%;每百万 389 个)有 20 个通过主动监测被细菌污染,导致 5 例 STR 在输血后 9 至 24 小时发生;这些 STR 均未被被动监测报告。STR 仅发生在中性粒细胞减少症患者中,这些患者输注了高细菌负荷的血小板。通过被动监测共报告了 284 例(0.55%)输血反应。这些患者均未输注污染的血小板。然而,284 例反应中有 6 至 93 例(2.1%-32.7%)符合 1 项或多项 STR 标准,STR 标准的敏感性从 5.1%到 45.5%不等。这些结果证明了中性粒细胞减少症患者中由于血小板细菌污染而导致 STR 的持续发生、被动监测未能检测到 STR 的事实以及 STR 标准缺乏特异性。这些发现突出了基于被动监测的报告的全国性 STR 数据的局限性,需要实施进一步的措施来解决这个问题,如二次检测或使用病原体减少技术。