IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ann Neurol. 2016 Feb;79(2):306-16. doi: 10.1002/ana.24567. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
To characterize the expression in skin nerves of native (n-syn) and misfolded phosphorylated (p-syn) α-synucleins in pure autonomic failure (PAF) and idiopathic Parkinson disease (IPD). The specific aims were to (1) define the importance of n-syn and p-syn as disease biomarkers and (2) ascertain differences in abnormal synuclein skin nerve deposits.
We studied 30 patients, including 16 well-characterized IPD patients and 14 patients fulfilling PAF diagnostic criteria, and 15 age-matched controls. Subjects underwent skin biopsy from proximal (ie, cervical) and distal (ie, thigh and leg) sites to study small nerve fiber and intraneural n-syn and p-syn.
PAF and IPD showed length-dependent somatic and autonomic small fiber loss, more severely expressed in patients with higher p-syn load. n-syn was similarly expressed in both groups of patients and controls. By contrast, p-syn was not evident in any skin sample of controls but was found in all PAF and IPD patients, although with different skin innervation. In addition, abnormal α-synuclein deposits were found in all analyzed skin samples in PAF but in only 49% of samples with a higher positivity rate at the proximal site in IPD.
(1) Intraneural p-syn was a reliable in vivo marker of PAF and IPD; (2) neuritic p-syn inclusions differed in PAF and IPD, suggesting a different underlying pathogenesis; (3) when searching for abnormal p-syn deposits in skin nerves, the site of analysis is irrelevant in PAF but it is critical in IPD.
描述原发性(n-syn)和错误折叠磷酸化(p-syn)α-突触核蛋白在单纯自主神经衰竭(PAF)和特发性帕金森病(IPD)皮肤神经中的表达特征。具体目标是:(1)确定 n-syn 和 p-syn 作为疾病生物标志物的重要性;(2)确定皮肤神经中异常突触核蛋白沉积物的差异。
我们研究了 30 名患者,包括 16 名特征明确的 IPD 患者和 14 名符合 PAF 诊断标准的患者,以及 15 名年龄匹配的对照者。所有受试者均接受近端(如颈)和远端(如大腿和小腿)皮肤活检,以研究小纤维神经和神经内 n-syn 和 p-syn。
PAF 和 IPD 表现出长度依赖性躯体和自主小纤维丧失,在 p-syn 负荷较高的患者中更为明显。n-syn 在两组患者和对照组中均有相似表达。相比之下,对照组的任何皮肤样本中均未发现 p-syn,但在所有 PAF 和 IPD 患者中均发现了 p-syn,尽管其皮肤神经支配不同。此外,异常的α-突触核蛋白沉积物在所有分析的 PAF 皮肤样本中均被发现,但在 IPD 中,近端部位的阳性率更高,只有 49%的样本存在异常。
(1)神经内 p-syn 是 PAF 和 IPD 的可靠体内标志物;(2)PAF 和 IPD 中的神经原性 p-syn 包涵体不同,提示其潜在发病机制不同;(3)在皮肤神经中寻找异常的 p-syn 沉积物时,分析部位在 PAF 中无关紧要,但在 IPD 中至关重要。