Suppr超能文献

高强度有氧运动与低强度有氧运动及力量训练对超重和肥胖女性的影响。

Effects of high-impact aerobics vs. low-impact aerobics and strength training in overweight and obese women.

作者信息

Said Mohamed, Lamya Ncir, Olfa Nejlaoui, Hamda Mansour

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, King Faisal University, Al-Hasa, Saudi Arabia -

Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Kef, Tunisia.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Mar;57(3):278-288. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.05857-X. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regular exercise is one of the factors determining weight reduction and fat loss, and at the same time it is associated with important health benefits. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two different modalities of exercise on changes in body composition, physical fitness, and CVR factors in healthy overweight and obese women.

METHODS

Thirty-two women were randomly assigned in 2 groups: a high-impact aerobics group (HIA, N.=16) and a low-impact aerobics combined with a strength training program group (LIAS, N.=16). Body weight (BW), body composition, aerobic fitness (AF), speed and agility, vertical-jump distance (VJ), abdominal muscle endurance (AME), the flexibility of the lower back and hamstrings, heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), HDL-c, LDL-c, apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) and B (Apo B) were measured at baseline and at the end of the training period.

RESULTS

A significant decrease was noted in all anthropometric variables excepting fat-free mass (FFM) which increased in LIAS group (P<0.05). Comparisons between groups noted significant differences in favor of HIA group in BW, fat percentage and FM, and in favor of LIAS group in FFM (P<0.05 for all). DBP, HR, TC, LDL-c, TG, and Apo B significantly decreased, and HDL-c and Apo A-I significantly increased in both groups. No significant modifications were noted in SBP and glucose concentrations. Significant improvements in all physical fitness components were also noted in HIA group (P<0.05), however, only the AF, VJ, AME, and the flexibility were improved in LIAS group (P<0.01). Comparison between groups reported that values related to VJ and AME were higher in LIAS compared to HIA group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings noted that a 24-week of HIA or LIAS training improved body composition, physical fitness and CVR factors in overweight and obese women. Nevertheless, the use of each training method remains tributary to wished effects. In fact, HIA training method is more effective in body weight reduction and fat loss, however, LIAS training method is more appropriate when the improvement of FFM, aerobic fitness and muscle strength is claimed.

摘要

背景

规律运动是决定体重减轻和脂肪减少的因素之一,同时它还具有重要的健康益处。本研究的目的是比较两种不同运动方式对健康超重和肥胖女性身体成分、体能及心血管危险因素变化的影响。

方法

32名女性被随机分为两组:高冲击有氧运动组(HIA,n = 16)和低冲击有氧运动结合力量训练计划组(LIAS,n = 16)。在基线和训练期结束时测量体重(BW)、身体成分、有氧适能(AF)、速度和敏捷性、垂直跳远距离(VJ)、腹肌耐力(AME)、下背部和腘绳肌柔韧性、心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-c)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)、载脂蛋白A-I(Apo A-I)和B(Apo B)。

结果

除无脂体重(FFM)在LIAS组增加外,所有人体测量变量均显著下降(P<0.05)。组间比较发现,在BW、脂肪百分比和脂肪量方面,HIA组有显著差异,而在FFM方面,LIAS组更占优势(所有P<0.05)。两组的DBP、HR、TC、LDL-c、TG和Apo B均显著下降,HDL-c和Apo A-I均显著增加。SBP和血糖浓度无显著变化。HIA组所有体能成分也有显著改善(P<0.05),然而,LIAS组仅AF、VJ、AME和柔韧性得到改善(P<0.01)。组间比较表明,LIAS组与VJ和AME相关的值高于HIA组(P<0.01)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,24周的HIA或LIAS训练可改善超重和肥胖女性的身体成分、体能及心血管危险因素。然而,每种训练方法的使用仍取决于期望的效果。事实上,HIA训练方法在减轻体重和减少脂肪方面更有效,然而,当要求改善FFM、有氧适能和肌肉力量时,LIAS训练方法更合适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验