Gagnière J, Le Roy B, Antomarchi O, Pereira B, Futier E, Dupré A, Buc E
Department of digestive and hepatobiliary surgery, hôpital Estaing, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 1, place Lucie-et-Raymond-Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Department of biostatistics (DRCI), CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, place Henri-Dunant, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J Visc Surg. 2016 Apr;153(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
Various clamping procedures are used to decrease bleeding during liver resections but their effect on central venous pressure (CVP) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the variations of the CVP during two different clamping procedures.
We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients (19 males, 10 females) who had Pringle maneuver (PM) and clamping of the inferior vena cava below the liver (IVCC) during major liver resections.
Mean decrease of the CVP after PM, IVCC, and PM+IVCC was 0.84 ± 1.37, 2.17 ± 2.13 and 3.17 ± 2.56 cmH20, respectively (P=0.02, P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). IVCC was more effective in inducing a decrease of the CVP than PM alone (P<0.05). The combination of both PM and IVCC induced the greatest decrease but not to a level of significance compared to IVCC alone (P=0.25).
IVCC remains the more efficient procedure to lower the CVP. However, although PM is commonly used to control vascular inflow within the liver its significant influence on the CVP could participate to the reduction of bleeding during liver resections.
在肝切除术中采用了各种钳夹方法以减少出血,但它们对中心静脉压(CVP)的影响仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估两种不同钳夹方法期间CVP的变化。
我们回顾性分析了29例患者(男性19例,女性10例),这些患者在大肝切除术中接受了Pringle手法(PM)和肝下下腔静脉钳夹(IVCC)。
PM、IVCC以及PM + IVCC后CVP的平均下降分别为0.84±1.37、2.17±2.13和3.17±2.56 cmH20(P分别为0.02、<0.0001和<0.0001)。IVCC在降低CVP方面比单独使用PM更有效(P<0.05)。PM和IVCC联合使用导致的下降幅度最大,但与单独使用IVCC相比无显著差异(P = 0.25)。
IVCC仍然是降低CVP更有效的方法。然而,尽管PM通常用于控制肝内血管流入,但其对CVP的显著影响可能有助于减少肝切除术中的出血。