Scasta J D, Henderson L, Smith T
J Anim Sci. 2015 Dec;93(12):5829-39. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9172.
Cow size has been suggested to be an important consideration for selecting cattle to match their production environment. Over the last several decades, the trend in genetic selection for maximum growth has led to gradual increases in beef cow size. An unrelated trend during this same period in the western United States has been an increase in temperature, drought frequency, and drought severity. Due to the potential influence of the increasing cow size trend on nutritional maintenance costs and production, we assessed the effect of cow size on weaning weight and efficiency in relation to drought on a semiarid high-elevation ranch in Wyoming. This study addresses a lack of empirical studies on the interaction between cow size and drought. We measured calf weaning weights of 80 Angus × Gelbvieh cows from 2011 to 2014 and assessed how drought affected weaning weights, efficiency (considered as calf weight relative to cow weight), intake requirements, and potential herd sizes relative to cow size. We stratified cows into 5 weight classes (453, 498, 544, 589, and 634 kg) as a proxy for cow size and adjusted weaning weights to a 210-d calf sex adjusted value. Cow size was a significant factor every year, with different cow sizes having advantages or disadvantages different years relative to weaning weight. However, efficiency for the smallest cows (453 kg) was always greater than efficiency for largest cows (634 kg; < 0.001). Efficiency for the smallest cows was greater in the driest year (0.41 ± 0.02) than efficiency of the largest cows in the wettest years (0.37 ± 0.01). The change in efficiency (ΔE) between wet and dry years was 0.18 for the smallest cow size and 0.02 for the largest cow size, and ΔE decreased as cow size increased. This is an indication of the ability of smaller cows to lower maintenance requirements in response to changes in the production environment but with optimal upside potential when conditions are favorable. These results indicate large cows (589 to 634 kg) do not maximize genetic potential in this production environment when conditions are optimum or provide any advantage over small or moderate size cows (453 to 544 kg) across the drought gradient.
奶牛体型被认为是选择奶牛以适应其生产环境的一个重要考虑因素。在过去几十年里,为实现最大生长而进行的基因选择趋势导致肉牛体型逐渐增大。同一时期,美国西部出现了另一个不相关的趋势,即气温升高、干旱频率增加和干旱程度加剧。鉴于奶牛体型增大趋势对营养维持成本和生产可能产生的影响,我们在怀俄明州一个半干旱高海拔牧场评估了奶牛体型对断奶体重和与干旱相关的效率的影响。本研究填补了关于奶牛体型与干旱之间相互作用的实证研究空白。我们测量了2011年至2014年80头安格斯×盖尔维杂交奶牛的犊牛断奶体重,并评估了干旱如何影响断奶体重、效率(以犊牛体重相对于母牛体重衡量)、采食量需求以及相对于奶牛体型的潜在牛群规模。我们将奶牛分为5个体重等级(453、498、544、589和634千克)作为奶牛体型的代表,并将断奶体重调整为210天犊牛性别校正值。每年奶牛体型都是一个重要因素,不同体型的奶牛相对于断奶体重在不同年份有优势或劣势。然而,最小体型奶牛(453千克)的效率始终高于最大体型奶牛(634千克;P<0.001)。最干旱年份最小体型奶牛的效率(0.41±0.02)高于最湿润年份最大体型奶牛的效率(0.37±0.01)。最小体型奶牛在湿润和干旱年份之间的效率变化(ΔE)为0.18,最大体型奶牛为0.02,且ΔE随着奶牛体型增大而减小。这表明较小体型的奶牛能够根据生产环境变化降低维持需求,但在条件有利时具有最佳的上升潜力。这些结果表明,在这种生产环境中,当条件最佳时,大体型奶牛(589至634千克)无法充分发挥遗传潜力,并且在整个干旱梯度上,与小体型或中等体型奶牛(453至544千克)相比没有任何优势。