Suppr超能文献

用于诊断伤寒沙门氏菌肠炎血清型的多重聚合酶链反应

Multiplex PCR for Diagnosis of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi.

作者信息

El-Shishtawy Mamdouh, El-Taweel Fathy, El-Mansoury Heba

出版信息

Clin Lab. 2015;61(10):1537-43. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150115.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Typhoid fever caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi is endemic in developing countries. Its detection by culturing on specific media or serological methods like the Widal test is time consuming and/or less sensitive than the PCR technique. Here we apply a multiplex PCR dependent detection for S. Typhi using two specific primers for invA and fliC genes.

METHODS

76 patients with clinical suspicion of typhoid fever were examined. Two sets of primers derived from invA and fliC genes specific for Salmonella spp. and S. Typhi were used as multiplex PCR in order to detect the pathogen in their blood samples. This was compared with traditional culturing methods on two different chromogenic media [Melibiose, mannitol, and sorbitol (MMS) agar media specific for S. Typhi and Salmonella-Shigella (SS) agar media]. Also, the suspected typhoid samples were tested by Widal O antigen.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of culturing, Widal test, and multiplex PCR were 61.36%, 88.64%, and 100%, respectively, while their specificities were 100%, 62.50%, and 86.49%, respectively. The multiplex PCR showed higher efficiency reaching 93.42% compared to culturing and Widal test which was 77.63%.

CONCLUSIONS

The high sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the studied multiplex PCR encourage us to recommend it as a useful tool for S. Typhi detection not only in clinically suspected negative culture individuals, but also for the false positive Widal test cases of typhoid fever in endemic regions.

摘要

背景

由伤寒沙门氏菌引起的伤寒热在发展中国家呈地方性流行。通过在特定培养基上培养或采用如肥达氏试验等血清学方法进行检测耗时较长,且比聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术的敏感性低。在此,我们应用一种基于多重PCR的方法,使用针对invA和fliC基因的两种特异性引物来检测伤寒沙门氏菌。

方法

对76例临床怀疑患有伤寒热的患者进行检查。使用两套分别源自沙门氏菌属和伤寒沙门氏菌的invA和fliC基因特异性引物进行多重PCR,以检测他们血液样本中的病原体。将此方法与在两种不同的显色培养基[针对伤寒沙门氏菌的蜜二糖、甘露醇和山梨醇(MMS)琼脂培养基以及沙门氏菌-志贺氏菌(SS)琼脂培养基]上的传统培养方法进行比较。此外,对疑似伤寒样本进行肥达氏O抗原检测。

结果

培养法、肥达氏试验和多重PCR的敏感性分别为61.36%、88.64%和100%,而它们的特异性分别为100%、62.50%和86.49%。与培养法和肥达氏试验(效率为77.63%)相比,多重PCR显示出更高的效率,达到93.42%。

结论

所研究的多重PCR具有高敏感性、特异性和效率,这促使我们推荐它作为一种有用的工具,不仅用于临床怀疑培养结果为阴性的个体中伤寒沙门氏菌的检测,也用于地方性流行地区伤寒热肥达氏试验假阳性病例的检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验