Schulz Christian, Schlieper Daniel, Altreuther Christiane, Schallenburger Manuela, Fetz Katharina, Schmitz Andrea
Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Department of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Dec 7;14:72. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0070-7.
End-of-life integrated care plans are used as structuring tools for the care of the dying. A widely adopted example is the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Recently, several concerns were raised about LCP care, such as a worry that diagnosis of dying might be leading to a self-fulfilling trajectory, including hastening of death. However, data on rates of discontinuation of LCP care are lacking. In an observational study, we therefore investigated the incidence, features and trajectory of patients who were discontinued from the LCP. We hypothesised that (1) it is common to discontinue patients from the LCP, (2) quality of life does not decrease for discontinued LCP patients, and (3) discontinued patients live longer than patients who remain within LCP care.
All adult patients who were diagnosed as dying in a German university hospital specialized palliative care unit were included in 2013 and 2014. Actuarial estimation of survival prognostication tools and a number of quality of life indicators were used for data collection. Survival time was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Group differences in quality of life were tested using multivariate analysis of variance.
159 patients were included in a digital version of the LCP. 15 patients (9.4 %) were discontinued later. Quality of life did not decrease for discontinued patients during LCP care (p = 0.16). LCP discontinued patients lived significantly longer than the remaining LCP subgroup (difference of means 296 hours, 95 % confidence interval 105.5 to 451.5 hours; difference of survival function estimates p < 0.0001).
When patients are diagnosed as dying, death is not the inevitable outcome of an end-of-life integrated care plan such as the LCP. Instead, it is common to discontinue the LCP care. Regular careful interprofessional assessments are important for identifying those patients who need to be discontinued from their end-of-life care plan. In this study, we found no evidence for harm by the LCP. We conclude that a correctly applied integrated care plan can be useful to provide good and safe care for the dying.
Internal Clinical Trial Register of the Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, No. 2015053680 (22 May 2015).
临终综合护理计划被用作临终护理的结构化工具。一个被广泛采用的例子是《利物浦临终患者护理路径》(LCP)。最近,人们对LCP护理提出了一些担忧,比如担心临终诊断可能导致一种自我实现的轨迹,包括加速死亡。然而,关于LCP护理中断率的数据却很缺乏。因此,在一项观察性研究中,我们调查了被中断LCP护理的患者的发生率、特征和轨迹。我们假设:(1)将患者从LCP护理中中断是常见的;(2)被中断LCP护理的患者生活质量不会下降;(3)被中断护理的患者比仍在接受LCP护理的患者活得更长。
纳入2013年和2014年在德国大学医院专业姑息治疗病房被诊断为临终的所有成年患者。使用生存预后工具的精算估计和一些生活质量指标进行数据收集。使用Kaplan-Meier估计分析生存时间。使用多变量方差分析测试生活质量的组间差异。
159名患者被纳入LCP的数字版本。15名患者(9.4%)后来被中断护理。在接受LCP护理期间,被中断护理的患者生活质量没有下降(p = 0.16)。被中断LCP护理的患者比其余LCP亚组患者活得明显更长(平均差异296小时,95%置信区间105.5至451.5小时;生存函数估计差异p < 0.0001)。
当患者被诊断为临终时,死亡并非像LCP这样的临终综合护理计划的必然结果。相反,中断LCP护理是常见的。定期进行仔细的多专业评估对于识别那些需要中断临终护理计划的患者很重要。在本研究中,我们没有发现LCP造成伤害的证据。我们得出结论,正确应用的综合护理计划可为临终患者提供良好且安全的护理。
杜塞尔多夫海因里希·海涅大学医学院内部临床试验注册,编号2015053680(2015年5月22日)。