Boutet Claire, Rouffiange-Leclair Laure, Schneider Fabien, Camdessanché Jean-Philippe, Antoine Jean-Christophe, Barral Fabrice-Guy
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Saint-x00C9;tienne, Saint-x00C9;tienne, France.
Neurodegener Dis. 2016;16(3-4):279-83. doi: 10.1159/000441420. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
Age-related white matter hyperintensities are frequent incidental findings on T2-weighted brain MRI, and they are evaluated in clinical practice using a visual rating scale.
To evaluate inter- and intra-rater agreement in MRI visual evaluations of age-related white matter hyperintensities made by two radiologists with different levels of experience using a visual rating scale.
Two radiologists of two different levels of experience separately rated age-related white matter hyperintensities in 40 consecutive 3-tesla brain MRI scans using the Fazekas and Schmidt visual rating scale. Ratings were made on axial FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) sequences. Two readings were made by each radiologist. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was statistically determined by using Cohen's weighted kappa analysis.
Forty patients (21 females, 19 males; mean age = 57 ± 18.43 years) were included between September and October 2011. Mean values ± SD for visual scores were as follows: periventricular hyperintensities, between 1.175 ± 0.9 and 1.375 ± 0.89; number of deep white matter hyperintensity lesions, between 1.325 ± 1.18 and 1.575 ± 1.15, and extent of deep white matter hyperintensity lesions, between 0.925 ± 0.78 and 1.1 ± 0.74. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was very good (x03BA; values, 0.85-0.91 and 0.80-0.97, respectively) for each of the three visual scale criteria, with significant correlations between ratings (r = 0.95; p < 0.0001) and readings (r = 0.91; p < 0.0001).
Visual assessment of age-related white matter hyperintensities by radiologists using a visual scale on FLAIR sequence is reproducible. Differences in experience level do not influence readings. Visual scale use is thus justified in common practice.
年龄相关性白质高信号是T2加权脑MRI检查中常见的偶然发现,在临床实践中使用视觉评分量表对其进行评估。
使用视觉评分量表评估两名经验水平不同的放射科医生对年龄相关性白质高信号进行MRI视觉评估时的评分者间和评分者内一致性。
两名经验水平不同的放射科医生分别使用Fazekas和Schmidt视觉评分量表对连续40例3特斯拉脑MRI扫描中的年龄相关性白质高信号进行评分。评分基于轴位液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)序列。每位放射科医生进行两次读数。使用Cohen加权kappa分析对评分者内和评分者间一致性进行统计学测定。
2011年9月至10月纳入40例患者(21例女性,19例男性;平均年龄 = 57 ± 18.43岁)。视觉评分的平均值±标准差如下:脑室周围高信号,在1.175 ± 0.9至1.375 ± 0.89之间;深部白质高信号病变数量,在1.325 ± 1.18至1.575 ± 1.15之间,以及深部白质高信号病变范围,在0.925 ± 0.78至1.1 ± 0.74之间。对于三个视觉量表标准中的每一个,评分者内和评分者间一致性都非常好(kappa值分别为0.85 - 0.91和0.80 - 0.97),评分之间(r = 0.95;p < 0.0001)和读数之间(r = 0.91;p < 0.0001)存在显著相关性。
放射科医生使用视觉量表在FLAIR序列上对年龄相关性白质高信号进行视觉评估具有可重复性。经验水平的差异不影响读数。因此,在常规实践中使用视觉量表是合理的。