Feys H B, Van Aelst B, Devloo R, Vandekerckhove P, Compernolle V
Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Ghent, Belgium.
Blood Service of the Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
Vox Sang. 2016 May;110(4):344-51. doi: 10.1111/vox.12365. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Apheresis platelet concentrates sometimes contain persistent aggregates (PA). Because apheresis involves extracorporeal circulation, we hypothesized that interactions between GPIbα and von Willebrand factor (VWF) underlie their origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Platelets in donations with PA were compared to aggregate-free (AF) controls. Flow cytometry was used to determine platelet bound VWF. Degranulation was measured using P-selectin expression in flow cytometry and cytokine release using immunosorbent assays. Platelet adhesion to VWF was assessed in hydrodynamic flow and real-time video microscopy. RESULTS: Platelets in PA concentrates had significantly more (P = 0·009, n ≥ 8) bound VWF compared to AF platelets, but differences in VWF concentration, VWF collagen binding, activated VWF or GPIbα expression were not found. Degranulation was higher (P = 0·030, n = 7) in PA than AF concentrates on day 1 of storage, but adhesion to immobilized VWF under hydrodynamic flow conditions was normal at that moment. On day 6, however, significantly less VWF adhesion (P = 0·009, n ≥ 6) was found for PA platelets compared to AF, indicating accelerated storage lesion in PA products. In a model that mimicks PA formation by chemically induced binding of VWF to platelets, we found that degranulation, phosphatidylserine expression and metabolism did not differ with paired controls at any time during subsequent storage. CONCLUSION: Accelerated storage lesion is found in concentrates with PA, but this cannot be explained solely by increased platelet bound VWF following apheresis. Therefore, additional stressors are probably responsible for the increases observed in platelet degranulation and storage lesion in products with PA.
背景与目的:单采血小板浓缩物有时会含有持续性聚集体(PA)。由于单采涉及体外循环,我们推测糖蛋白Ibα(GPIbα)与血管性血友病因子(VWF)之间的相互作用是其产生的基础。 材料与方法:将含有PA的献血中的血小板与无聚集体(AF)的对照进行比较。采用流式细胞术测定血小板结合的VWF。使用流式细胞术中P-选择素的表达来测量脱颗粒情况,并使用免疫吸附测定法测量细胞因子释放。在流体动力学流动和实时视频显微镜下评估血小板对VWF的黏附。 结果:与AF血小板相比,PA浓缩物中的血小板结合的VWF显著更多(P = 0·009,n≥8),但未发现VWF浓度、VWF与胶原蛋白结合、活化的VWF或GPIbα表达存在差异。在储存第1天,PA中的脱颗粒程度高于AF浓缩物(P = 0·030,n = 7),但此时在流体动力学流动条件下对固定化VWF的黏附正常。然而,在第6天,与AF相比,PA血小板的VWF黏附显著减少(P = 0·009,n≥6),表明PA产品中储存损伤加速。在一个通过化学诱导VWF与血小板结合来模拟PA形成的模型中,我们发现脱颗粒、磷脂酰丝氨酸表达和代谢在随后储存的任何时间与配对对照均无差异。 结论:在含有PA的浓缩物中发现储存损伤加速,但这不能仅通过单采后血小板结合的VWF增加来解释。因此,其他应激因素可能是导致PA产品中血小板脱颗粒和储存损伤增加的原因。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017-12
J Cell Physiol. 2018-2
Thromb Haemost. 2016-7-4