Trinh Thai Q, Ferrel Jason R, Pulley Benjamin R, Fowler T Ty
Orthopedics. 2015 Dec;38(12):e1091-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-05.
The direct anterior approach has recently gained popularity for patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. It is unknown whether the reported benefits of the direct anterior approach to elective total hip arthroplasty can be extrapolated to patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture. A retrospective review of 101 patients was performed to compare the outcomes of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty using the direct anterior approach (group 1) with those of patients undergoing the procedure with the posterior, anterolateral, or lateral approach (group 2). No differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and preinjury ambulatory status were identified between treatment groups. No difference in operative time was found between those undergoing the anterior approach (98.7 minutes) and those undergoing other surgical approaches (96.5 minutes) (P=.76). No difference in either the need for transfusion or the number of blood products transfused was seen (P=.21) postoperatively. Patients undergoing the direct anterior approach were more likely to be discharged by postoperative day 3 (P=.004) despite no difference in the recorded number of feet ambulated in the hospital. At a mean clinical follow-up of 16 weeks, there was no difference in the rate of return to baseline ambulatory status between groups (P=.07). The overall rates of major and minor complications for all patients were 23% and 26%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between groups. The overall dislocation rate of all patients was found to be 3%. All dislocations were observed in group 2. Larger prospective studies are needed to further define the benefits of the direct anterior approach in this patient population.
直接前路手术最近在接受择期全髋关节置换术的患者中受到欢迎。目前尚不清楚直接前路手术用于择期全髋关节置换术所报道的益处是否可以外推至股骨颈骨折后接受半髋关节置换术的患者。对101例患者进行了回顾性研究,以比较采用直接前路行半髋关节置换术的患者(第1组)与采用后外侧、前外侧或外侧入路行该手术的患者(第2组)的治疗效果。治疗组之间在年龄、美国麻醉医师协会分级和伤前活动状态方面未发现差异。前路手术患者(98.7分钟)与采用其他手术入路的患者(96.5分钟)之间手术时间无差异(P = 0.76)。术后输血需求或输注血液制品数量均无差异(P = 0.21)。尽管住院期间记录的行走步数无差异,但采用直接前路手术的患者在术后第3天更有可能出院(P = 0.004)。平均临床随访16周时,两组恢复至基线活动状态的比例无差异(P = 0.07)。所有患者的主要和次要并发症总发生率分别为23%和26%,组间无统计学显著差异。所有患者的总体脱位率为3%。所有脱位均见于第2组。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来进一步明确直接前路手术在该患者群体中的益处。