Sun Haifeng, Hu Pingping, Shen Hongchang, Dong Wei, Zhang Tiehong, Liu Qi, Du Jiajun
Institute of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 324 Jingwu Road, Jinan, P.R. China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0144663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144663. eCollection 2015.
It has been reported nutritional status and systemic inflammation were associated with the outcome of patients with malignancies. However, the prognostic value of combination of them was really scarce, especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to find a more simple and efficient predictor, we hypothesized that pretreatment albumin and neutrophil combined prognostic grade (ANPG) could offer an improved prognostic ability in NSCLC patients.
We collected pretreatment albumin and neutrophil, clinicopathological, treatment and follow-up data of 1033 consecutive NSCLC patients treated between 2006 and 2011 in this retrospective study. The ANPG was calculated according to pretreatment albumin and neutrophil levels dichotomized by the optimal cut-off values, the quartile values and the clinical reference values. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves and Cox proportional regression were used for survival analyses. All the data was analyzed by SPSS 20.0.
According to optimal cut-off values and quartile values, significant differences were found in different pretreatment albumin, neutrophil levels and ANPG from the K-M curve (all p<0.05). Univariate analyses and multivariate analyses disclosed ANPG was a more sensitive independent predictor for both overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) than either albumin level or neutrophil level (HRs were higher for ANPG). As for clinical reference values, no significant difference of pretreatment albumin levels was found in K-M curve and univariate analyses. All three indexes lost their significance in multivariate analyses.
Higher ANPG predicts worse OS and PFS in NSCLC patients independently, and it is more sensitive than hypoalbuminaemia and neutrophilia. It might be used as a reliable, convenient and more sensitive predictor to assist the identification of patients with poor prognosis and be a hierarchical factor in the future NSCLC clinical trials.
据报道,营养状况和全身炎症与恶性肿瘤患者的预后相关。然而,它们两者结合的预后价值却非常缺乏,尤其是在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中。为了找到一个更简单有效的预测指标,我们假设治疗前白蛋白和中性粒细胞联合预后分级(ANPG)可以提高NSCLC患者的预后预测能力。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们收集了2006年至2011年间连续治疗的1033例NSCLC患者的治疗前白蛋白、中性粒细胞、临床病理、治疗及随访数据。根据治疗前白蛋白和中性粒细胞水平的最佳截断值、四分位数和临床参考值进行二分法计算ANPG。采用Kaplan-Meier(K-M)曲线和Cox比例回归进行生存分析。所有数据均用SPSS 20.0进行分析。
根据最佳截断值和四分位数,从K-M曲线分析发现,不同治疗前白蛋白、中性粒细胞水平及ANPG存在显著差异(均p<0.05)。单因素分析和多因素分析显示,ANPG对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)而言,是比白蛋白水平或中性粒细胞水平更敏感的独立预测指标(ANPG的风险比更高)。至于临床参考值,在K-M曲线和单因素分析中未发现治疗前白蛋白水平有显著差异。在多因素分析中,所有三个指标均失去其显著性。
较高的ANPG独立预测NSCLC患者较差的OS和PFS,且比低白蛋白血症和中性粒细胞增多更敏感。它可能作为一个可靠、便捷且更敏感的预测指标,有助于识别预后不良的患者,并在未来的NSCLC临床试验中作为一个分层因素。