Szablewski Vanessa, Ingen-Housz-Oro Saskia, Baia Maryse, Delfau-Larue Marie-Helene, Copie-Bergman Christiane, Ortonne Nicolas
*Pathology Department, CHU Montpellier, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier †Dermatology Department §Immunology and Hematology Department ¶Pathology Department, AP-HP, Groupe Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier ‡INSERM, U955 team 9 ∥Medical University, Paris Est Creteil university (UPEC), UMR-S, Créteil, France.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Jan;40(1):127-36. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000567.
The classification of cutaneous follicular lymphoma (CFL) into primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL) or secondary cutaneous follicular lymphoma (SCFL) is challenging. SCFL is suspected when tumor cells express BCL2 protein, reflecting a BCL2 translocation. However, BCL2 expression is difficult to assess in CFLs because of numerous BCL2+ reactive T cells. To investigate these issues and to further characterize PCFCL, we studied a series of 25 CFLs without any extracutaneous disease at diagnosis, selected on the basis of BCL2 protein expression using 2 BCL2 antibodies (clones 124 and E17) and BOB1/BCL2 double immunostaining. All cases were studied using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization with BCL2, BCL6, IGH, IGK, IGL breakapart, IGH-BCL2 fusion, and 1p36/1q25 dual-color probes. Nineteen CFLs were BCL2 positive, and 6 were negative. After a medium follow-up of 24 (6 to 96) months, 5 cases were reclassified as SCFL and were excluded from a part of our analyses. Among BCL2+ PCFCLs, 60% (9/15) demonstrated a BCL2 break. BCL2-break-positive cases had a tendency to occur in the head and neck and showed the classical phenotype of nodal follicular lymphoma (CD10+, BCL6+, BCL2+, STMN+) compared with BCL2-break-negative PCFCLs. Del 1p36 was observed in 1 PCFCL. No significant clinical differences were observed between BCL2+ or BCL2- PCFCL. In conclusion, we show that a subset of PCFCLs harbor similar genetic alterations, as observed in nodal follicular lymphomas, including BCL2 breaks and 1p36 deletion. As BCL2 protein expression is usually associated with the presence of a BCL2 translocation, fluorescence in situ hybridization should be performed to confirm this hypothesis.
将皮肤滤泡性淋巴瘤(CFL)分类为原发性皮肤滤泡中心淋巴瘤(PCFCL)或继发性皮肤滤泡性淋巴瘤(SCFL)具有挑战性。当肿瘤细胞表达BCL2蛋白时,提示存在BCL2易位,此时怀疑为SCFL。然而,由于存在大量BCL2阳性反应性T细胞,在CFL中评估BCL2表达较为困难。为了研究这些问题并进一步明确PCFCL的特征,我们对一系列25例诊断时无任何皮肤外疾病的CFL进行了研究,这些病例是根据使用两种BCL2抗体(克隆124和E17)的BCL2蛋白表达以及BOB1/BCL2双重免疫染色选择的。所有病例均使用BCL2、BCL6、IGH、IGK、IGL分离、IGH-BCL2融合以及1p36/1q25双色探针进行间期荧光原位杂交研究。19例CFL为BCL2阳性,6例为阴性。经过平均24(6至96)个月的随访,5例被重新分类为SCFL,并被排除在部分分析之外。在BCL2阳性的PCFCL中,60%(9/15)显示有BCL2断裂。与BCL2断裂阴性的PCFCL相比,BCL2断裂阳性的病例倾向于发生在头颈部,并且表现出典型的淋巴结滤泡性淋巴瘤表型(CD10+、BCL6+、BCL2+、STMN+)。在1例PCFCL中观察到1p36缺失。BCL2阳性或BCL2阴性的PCFCL之间未观察到显著的临床差异。总之,我们发现一部分PCFCL具有与淋巴结滤泡性淋巴瘤相似的基因改变,包括BCL2断裂和1p36缺失。由于BCL2蛋白表达通常与BCL2易位的存在相关,应进行荧光原位杂交以证实这一假设。